Unveiling the atmosphere: insights from TEFAF Maastricht's jewel heist through research
As the 37th edition of TEFAF Maastricht is set to welcome visitors from 9th to 14th of March, many will remember the armed jewel heist that took place almost two years ago. During TEFAF opening hours on 28th of June 2022, five men violently smashed a display case with a sledgehammer, removed jewellery, and then escaped. At the time, two elements of the heist, namely, costumes worn by the thieves and the muted reaction and calmness of many onlookers captivated the traditional and social media.
About the researchers
Last year Dr Donna Yates and I published an article titled Affective Atmosphere in an Art Fair Jewel Heist[1]. We both are criminologists whose research involves art crime. Prior to the heist, we had been conducting observational fieldwork[2] at TEFAF focusing on senses, affective qualities of objects, and on the atmosphere of a space. Through our work, we were able to better understand and explain the costumes worn by the thieves and reaction by onlookers.
Blending into the atmosphere
TEFAF creates an atmosphere of ‘eliteness’ and luxury. It is a deeply affective space created and maintained in number of ways catering to different senses. This includes large installations of flowers, champagne and oysters available at various points throughout the fair, deep carpets, and lavish booths. While TEFAF does not have formally written dress code, attendees tend to follow the unwritten rules. Clothing conforms to the elite atmosphere, and at the same time, the clothing sustains the elite atmosphere – it is a self-sustaining phenomenon. People who do not conform to this atmosphere stick out. While people on social media interpreted the costumes as absurd, within this highly affective setting, the costumes chosen by the thieves made perfect sense. They disappeared within the space, blended in with the other attendees, and were able to go undetected by the security.
Not only did the atmosphere of the fair dictate how the thieves need to dress, but it also hindered the way the onlookers interpreted the robbery. Within this space, the onlookers thought that they are witnessing art and not crime. This is not an unreasonable interpretation of the heist considering the wider art world context[3]. Several art fair participants that we spoke with the day after the heist thought that the heist was a performance art or a protest. Only few fair participants expressed feelings of being in danger or feeling unsafe.
In a nutshell
Art fairs have been specifically designed to influence people. The atmosphere of an art fair is a deeply affective one. The way the crimes that are carried out in this space are affected by the ambience. Yet the same atmosphere also affects the way onlookers experience and interpret these crimes. While outside of the art fair the attire chosen by the thieves and muted reaction to a violent robbery seemed absurd, within the context of art fair both made perfect sense.
Read more about this research
Interested in reading the full article? You can find it here.
[1]Yates, D., Bērziņa, D. Affective Atmosphere in an Art Fair Jewel Heist. Eur J Crim Policy Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-023-09549-7
[2] This fieldwork is part of the larger ERC-funded Trafficking Transformations project. More information about the project: https://traffickingtransformations.org
[3] E.g., ‘Banksy tried to destroy his art after it sold for $1.4 million. The shredded version just went for $25.4 million’. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/10/15/shredded-banksy-painting/
Protests taking place in the museums such as ‘Campaigners protest against BP sponsorship of British Museum’. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2019/feb/16/campaigners-protest-against-bp-sponsorship-of-britishmuseum
D. Berzina
Diāna Bērziņa is a Researcher on the project ‘Trafficking Transformations: Objects as Agents in Transnational Criminal Networks’ based in the department of Criminal Law and Criminology at Maastricht University.
-
Rules Under Fire: The Case for International Trade Law Today
On 17 April, many of us had the pleasure of attending an IGIR Expert Lecture by John Clarke, former Chief Agriculture Negotiator of the European Union and former Head of the EU Delegation to the World Trade Organization and the United Nations in Geneva. He is currently a fellow at the Maastricht...
-
Before the World Court: What Is at Stake in the Advisory Proceedings on Israel’s Obligations in Relation to the United Nations and Other Actors in the Occupied Palestinian Territory
This explainer provides essential context on the ICJ’s advisory opinion request on Obligations of Israel in relation to the Presence and Activities of the United Nations, Other International Organizations and Third States in and in relation to the Occupied Palestinian Territory. The hearings...
-
Exploring Artificial Intelligence and Regulatory Challenges in Marine Environmental Policy
As part of the ‘AI & Marine Environmental Policy: What Role for Automated Systems?’ research project, a sensemaking workshop took place at Maastricht University’s Faculty of Law on March 28, 2025.
