Law and Tech Research

The Maastricht Law and Tech Lab adopts a innovation through co-creation approach to research. Our research is carried out through close and complete collaboration between lawyers, data scientists and knowledge engineers. By jointly designing and conducting research projects in co-creation, our interdisciplinary approach fuels knowledge discoveries and prototypes of legal technology that have mutual value for law, data science and knowledge engineering.

Considering all angles!

The digital society begs new questions about how innovative technologies interact with law and justice. This interaction between law and technology essentially goes in two directions: Technology for Law, and Law for Technology.
 

Explore our current research projects, PhD projects, flagship projects, past research projects, and publications below!

Explore Our Current Research

Free the Law
Ongoing (since 2024)

Ongoing (since 2024)

RegTech4AI

RegTech4AI 

 

Description

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a cornerstone of the regulation of AI in the EU. It seeks to facilitate the flow of data across the EU while protecting citizens’ fundamental rights – including data protection and privacy. Even though the GDPR is now more than 7 years old, there remain significant gaps between the law and practice. For example, past research by the project lead showed that less than 10% of mobile apps fulfil the minimum legal requirements regarding consent – one of the core principles of GDPR. As the EU is introducing the AI Act (i.e. its first law aimed directly at AI), it is likely that again – like with GDPR – enforcement will be lagging and that businesses will be overwhelmed by the legal obligations. In response, RegTech4AI will research regulatory technologies (RegTech) to assist enforcement agencies and businesses with AI regulation, and thereby bolster trust in AI systems among citizens. 

 Researchers

Konrad Kollnig, Gijs van Dijck, Qian Li, Kamil Szostak, Bram Rijsbosch, Lucas Giovanni Uberti-Bona Marin

Ongoing (since 2020)

GreaseX: Tackling Digital Harms

GreaseX: Tackling Digital Harms 

 

Description 

Harms in user interfaces are widespread. In current scholarship, some of these harms are often referred to as dark patterns or deceptive practices. Other harms, such as hate speech or age-inappropriate content, are also frequently mentioned. However, such categorisations can be too simplistic: what is perceived as harmful often depends greatly on the individual. This is why, in this project, we are exploring how to use state-of-the-art machine learning methods to modify user interfaces on desktop and mobile devices in real-time, and to build personalised models to reduce digital harms. In other words, rather than relying on platforms (and Elon Musk) to take the lead on content moderation, we have been working to devolve some of the power and responsibility for content moderation to end-users. 

 Researchers 

Siddhartha Datta (University of Oxford), Konrad Kollnig  

Ongoing (since 2022)

Lawnotation: Platform for Labeling Legal Data

Lawnotation: Platform for Labeling Legal Data 

 

Description 

The LAWNOTATION project aims to develop an infrastructure that allows researchers to making legal data and annotation schemes (current and future) accessible for annotation and analysis purposes, to develop an annotation platform for analyzing the linguistic and legal characteristics of legal documents, and to build a user-friendly interface. 
 
A team of developers will work closely together with researchers on the improved access to legal materials. LAWNOTATION is an initiative of the Digital Legal Studies cluster in the Sectorplan Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) - Rechtsgeleerdheid and other Dutch universities that are collaboratively working on questions related to the digitalisation of law. The research is made possible by the Platform Digitale Infrastructuur SSH 

 Researchers 

prof. Gijs van Dijck (Maastricht University), Hannes Westermann (BISS), Shashank Chakravarthy (BISS), Carlos Aguilera (BISS), prof. Martijn Wieling, prof. Michel Vols (Groningen University), prof. Tom van Engers, prof. Guiseppe Dari-Mattiacci, dr. Balasz Bodó (University of Amsterdam), prof. Andre Janssen, prof. Pietro Ortolani, dr. Pieter Wolters (Radboud University), prof. Floris Bex (Tilburg University / Utrecht University), Robert van Doesburg (TNO / University of Amsterdam). 

Ongoing (since 2019)

Case Law Explorer: Finding Precedents in Case Law

Case Law Explorer: Finding Precedents in Case Law 

 

Description

Traditionally, court decisions are manually read and analyzed in legal education and legal research. However, network analysis based on court citations have shown the potential to answer questions such as: What are the landmark cases in a corpus of decisions?, Which clusters of decisions can be distinguished, and Do certain courts cite different decisions? This project aims at bridging the gap between available computer science techniques for law, and the non-technical legal community. It will provide legal researchers and law students a software platform that visualizes large sets of court decisions as a network, where nodes represent cases and edges represent citations. Users can navigate through the corpus, spot clusters of cases, and access the full case documentation of any selected case in the network. 

This project will provide legal researchers, students, and practitioners an accessible gateway to available technologies applicable to their studies, research or work. This project was funded by a Comenius Teaching Fellows 2019 grant and by a Surf Open Leermaterialen (Web of Law) 2020 grant. 

 Researchers 

Gijs van Dijck, Shashank Chakravarthy, Carlos Aguilera (former researchers: Kody Moodley, Marcel Schaper, Michel Dumontier, Shashank Chakravarthy, Maxine Hanrieder, Bogdan Covrig, Turgay Saba, Pedro V. Hernández Serrano). 

Ongoing (since 2024)

Waste-free, Automated, Legally certain, Legitimate - Euro (WALL-E) transportation and logistics

Waste-free, Automated, Legally certain, Legitimate - Euro (WALL-E) transportation and logistics 

 

Description

The “WALL-E” transportation and logistics research agenda focuses on multidisciplinary and comparative studies addressing multiparty legal structures in transport chains and societal preferences for sustainable technological advancements. It also aims to unite experts from various fields, including law, social sciences, economics, business administration, logistics, and computer science, to explore complex societal issues related to the development of intelligent transport systems. 

Researchers 

Marta Kolacz 

Ongoing (since 2020)

CyberCrimeLinker: Online Criminals as Authors

CyberCrimeLinker: Online Criminals as Authors 

 

Description 

This research addresses the challenge of connecting vendors involved in illegal activities on online markets, a critical task for law enforcement agencies. The manual investigation becomes impractical and resource-intensive with the vast number of vendors and the frequent use of multiple aliases or migration between markets. By leveraging machine learning and authorship attribution techniques, we aim to identify and link these vendors across different platforms, including darknet markets for illegal vendors and escort markets for potential human trafficking vendors. This provides a scalable and effective solution for uncovering hidden connections and aiding in more efficient resource allocation for law enforcement. Additionally, we establish the groundwork to promote ethical authorship attribution by proposing responsible guidelines, ensuring that these approaches are used ethically and responsibly. 

VendorLink

IDTraffickers Dataset

 Researchers 

Vageesh Saxena, Gerasimos Spanakis, Gijs Van Dijck 

 

Ongoing (since 2023)

Global Privacy Control for Mobile

Global Privacy Control for Mobile 

 

Description

Apps and their integrated third-party libraries often collect large amounts of data from Android users to show personalized ads. This can be highly invasive and problematic. Privacy law in California (as of 2021) and Colorado (as of 2024) requires apps and websites to respect opt-outs from ad tracking via the Global Privacy Control (GPC). However, this standard has not yet been widely transposed into mobile apps, and consumer cannot make use of their legally mandated privacy protections. This is why we’ve been studying the level of compliance with the GPC, building the necessary interdisciplinary methodology to do so, and creating reference implementations of GPC for Android. We closely work with responsible regulators in this research. 

 Researchers 

Konrad Kollnig, Sebastian Zimmeck (Wesleyan University) 

Explore Our PhD Projects

The Automated Detection of Non-Compliance with EU Directives Hellen van der Kroef

Description: This highly interdisciplinary research project is situated at the intersection of law, linguistics and computer science. It aims to explore how automation and computational tools can assist in the detection of legal (non-)compliance in the transposition of EU directives, specifically by applying comparative computational linguistics to the legislative texts of directives and their corresponding transpositions. The multilingual analysis extends to Member States that have Dutch, English, French, German or Spanish as an official legislative language. The legal area of focus is on consumer protection. The results of this project will provide empirical, quantitative evidence for observations commonly made in legal and legal-linguistic literature. 

Researchers: Hellen van der Kroef, Rohan Nanda (supervisor), Daniel On (supervisor), Gijs van Dijck (supervisor). 

Status: Ongoing (2021 – 2025). 

More information: To be published. 

Effectiveness and Acceptance of Personalized Law Iris Xu

Description: This project aims to explore the effectiveness and acceptance of personalized law, with a focus on personalization in privacy disclosures (e.g., privacy policies) and privacy decision-making (e.g., personalized privacy assistants). By grounding our research in user perspectives, we employ a range of qualitative and quantitative empirical methods—including surveys, eye-tracking experiments, semi-structured interviews, and focus groups—to investigate user responses and perceptions of personalization for privacy protection. The findings will also contribute to the broader discussion on the feasibility of personalized legal treatments for all. 

Researchers: Iris Xu, Aurelia Tamò-Larrieux (supervisor, University of Lausanne), Caroline Cauffman (supervisor) 

Status: Ongoing (2022 – 2025) 

More information: To be published.  

Data-driven Nudges in Investment Apps Wen-Ting Yang

Data-driven Nudges in Investment Apps 

Description: This project aims to explore the legal feasibility of using ‘nudge techniques’ in investment apps to enhance the protection of retail investors. We target common problematic behaviors among retail investors and propose a range of nudge interventions that could be implemented in investment apps to address these issues. To ensure the legality of the proposed interventions, we assess their compliance with regulations such as the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID), the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD), and the Digital Services Act (DSA). We also develop a theoretical basis for the ‘duty to nudge’ of investment app operators and conduct an economic analysis to assess whether operators have sufficient incentives to adopt these interventions. Therefore, this project aims to build a comprehensive theoretical framework for the use of nudges in investment apps, and we believe the findings will contribute to the broader discussion on retail investor protection and the lawful and ethical use of nudges. 

Researchers: Wen-Ting Yang, Caroline Cauffman (supervisor, Maastricht University), Monika Leszczynska (supervisor, Texas A&M University) 

Status: Ongoing (2022 – 2026) 

More information: To be published. 

The Place of Smart Contracts within the Architecture of Commercial Agreements in Global Trade Maria Breskaya

Description: This research project explores what lies behind the claim of smart contracts to create ‘new and more efficient ways to formalise and secure agreements’, and how this claim can be satisfactory to the demands of commercial relationships in global trade. Are smart contracts designed merely to supplement traditional contracts with automation and data security, or do they aim to restructure the ways markets operate and commercial relationships are formed? Situated at the intersection of law and technology, this research investigates the place of smart contracts within the architecture of global trade agreements that often comprise a complex combination of formal legal norms and private ordering mechanisms. 

The research’s findings aim to establish common terminology among legal and computer science scholars within the topic of smart contracts through literature reviews and expert interviews, and to create a more transparent understanding of the potential of smart contracts in formalising and shaping commercial relationships. 

Researchers: Maria Breskaya, Jan Smits (supervisor), Caroline Cauffman (supervisor) 

Status: Ongoing (2023-2029) 

Damages for Privacy Infringements Stephan Mulders

Description: Article 82 GDPR has direct effect and thus offers a direct legal remedy. However, the concept of damages is only very broadly defined. This project analyzes whether and under which circumstances non-material damages should be awarded for psychological harms, such as anxiety and distress. 

Researchers: Stephan Mulders, Aurelia Tamò-Larrieux (supervisor, University of Lausanne), Gijs van Dijck (supervisor) 

Status: Ongoing (2020 – 2025) 

More information: [The relationship between the principle of effectiveness under Art. 47 CFR and the concept of damages under Art. 82 GDPR](https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipad012) and [Collective Damages for GDPR Breaches: A Feasible solution for the GDPR Enforcement Deficit?]( https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2022/4/8) 

Explore Our Publications