PhD conferral Mr H.J.C. (Ricardo) Nieuwkamp, LL.M

Supervisor: prof.dr. P.J. van Koppen
Co-supervisor:  dr. R. Horselenberg

“Where I was and how I will prove it; on the believability of alibis“

Keywords: innocent suspects, alibi, evidence, memory

Innocent suspects are expected to prove their innocence by providing a credible alibi. However, only 2% of non-offenders are able to do so. Although detectives only find an alibi credible if it remains unchanged and it is supported by strong evidence, such as camera images, the alibi of non-offenders is usually supported by weaker evidence, such as a witness testimony. Non-offenders may also make a mistake or lie to cover up being with a mistress, for instance. When assessing a suspect’s alibi, detectives should therefore take into account the content of the alibi, the feasibility of obtaining (strong) evidence and the fallibility of memory.

Also read

  • PhD defence Meihe Xu

    " One Size Fits None: Effectiveness and Acceptability of Personalized Transparency and Privacy Assistance in the United States, the European Union, and China"
    PhD defence
    17 Jun
  • PhD defence Selman Aksünger

    " Beyond Shifting Shores: Rethinking Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources in the Context of Sea-Level Rise"
    PhD defence
    24 Jun