Law and Hip Hop Music
Project aimed at analysing the role of law in hip hop music.
In the last few months, I have been working with three enthusiastic Maastricht students in a project aimed at analysing the role of law in hip hop music. My own interest in this theme stems from a fascination for the law and literature movement. One of the aims of this movement is to learn how the law is perceived in society: literary books (or movies and television series) can tell us something about the law as seen through the eyes of the general public. In this respect, it comes as a surprise that hip hop music was never studied before. The lyrics of artists like Snoop Dogg, Jay-Z, 50 Cent and Eminem contain a wealth of materials on how the law is perceived in the ghetto’s of American cities. It is difficult to find a greater contrast between the standard view of law and the perception of law we can discern in the lyrics of these artists. The project aims at identifying principles of hip hop law and to contrast these with the common principles of law. In Jay-Z’s Justify my Thug (2003), the lyrics read ‘If you shoot my dog, I’ma kill yo’ cat… know dat/For every action there’s a reaction’, which reminds us of ‘an eye for an eye’ mentality and minimal trust in the state in protecting people. A sense of shame about criminal acts also seems to be missing as one’s street credibility increases with the number of convictions. Re-education by punishment then seems useless: ‘Every N….. sellin, but can you blame/The fact the only way a brother can survive the game.’ If we were to design our ideal law by making use of John Rawls’ veil of ignorance, we would probably have to imagine what it must be like to survive in the modern urban ghetto: hip hop lyrics can provide a wonderful source of information in this respect. In this week’s Observant (Maastricht University’s weekly newspaper) there is an interview by Maurice Timmermans with the students (Andrei Ernst, Nida Riaz and Steve Iseger) and me in which we explain our findings. The project will result in a jointly written article that we hope to publish in an interested law journal.
-
Breaking Legal Boundaries: How Private International Law Can Keep Up With Global Value Chains
On Wednesday 29th January, M-EPLI welcomed Prof. dr. Toshiyuki Kono, Professor at the Graduate School of Law at Kyushu University, Japan. The event was moderated by Dr. Daniel On, followed by an insightful commentary by Prof. dr. Marta Pertegas and discussion with the participants.
-
The Anti-SLAPP Directive as a Roadmap for SLAPP Targets and the Obstacles Along the Way
To uphold the right to freedom of expression and information, it is essential that ‘public watchdogs’, including journalists, academics, bloggers, human rights activists, and NGOs can expose and highlight social issues, such as corruption and violations of fundamental rights. However, there has been...
-
The Withdrawal of the AI Liability Directive: A Critical Reflection on AI Liability in the EU
On September 28, 2022, the European Commission proposed the AI Liability Directive (AILD) as part of its strategy to create a unified regulatory framework for AI technologies in Europe. The Product Liability Directive (PLD), proposed at the same time, has since garnered acceptance and was adopted...