Search results

… the thorough preparation and extensive documentation furnished by the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, by the hospitable reception given to the committee during the on-site visit, and by the frank and friendly spirit in which staff members engaged with our queries during the interviews. I would also like to express my special appreciation for the invaluable support provided by the committee's secretary, Sylvia Bastiaanssen. Prof. dr J.Th. Leerssen chair Evaluation Report Arts and Social Sciences … in any way imply that the final score was an average of all scores. The final score was only given after careful consideration by the entire committee. The Committee’s assessment at the institute level primarily focused on strategy and organization, whereas the programme assessment primarily focused on performance and activities of researchers and the results of their work (output and outcome). At the institute level, the Committee paid explicit attention to the (policy regarding) education and … Mission and goals; Strategy and policy (Inter)national position and recognition; Prominence of the pro-gramme director and other research staff; Impact and significance of research results in the field Human resources; Funding policies and earning capacity; Rele-vance of research facilities Objectives and institutional embedding; Structure of programmes; Supervision; Success rates; Educational resources Productivity B1. Productivity strategy B2. Productivity Productivity goals; Publication Strategy; …

… the thorough preparation and extensive documentation furnished by the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, by the hospitable reception given to the committee during the on-site visit, and by the frank and friendly spirit in which staff members engaged with our queries during the interviews. I would also like to express my special appreciation for the invaluable support provided by the committee's secretary, Sylvia Bastiaanssen. Prof. dr J.Th. Leerssen chair Evaluation Report Arts and Social Sciences … in any way imply that the final score was an average of all scores. The final score was only given after careful consideration by the entire committee. The Committee’s assessment at the institute level primarily focused on strategy and organization, whereas the programme assessment primarily focused on performance and activities of researchers and the results of their work (output and outcome). At the institute level, the Committee paid explicit attention to the (policy regarding) education and … Mission and goals; Strategy and policy (Inter)national position and recognition; Prominence of the pro-gramme director and other research staff; Impact and significance of research results in the field Human resources; Funding policies and earning capacity; Rele-vance of research facilities Objectives and institutional embedding; Structure of programmes; Supervision; Success rates; Educational resources Productivity B1. Productivity strategy B2. Productivity Productivity goals; Publication Strategy; …