The Professional Qualifications Directive: Still No Compliance?
In the EU, the mobility of many professionals is governed by the Professional Qualifications Directive. The instrument was introduced in 2005 and adapted in 2013. Due to be implemented on 18 January 2016, the directive’s transposition apparently leaves much to be desired. On 7 March 2019 the Commission issued a large number of infringement proceedings against the Member States for having incorrectly transposed the directive.
Making use of qualifications across Member States is an important aspect related to transnational and cross-border mobility. Of course, labour market access is, in principle, free due to the free movement articles enshrined in the EU Treaties. Nevertheless, one group of professionals may be restricted in their mobility. Some professions are regulated, meaning that requirements related to diplomas and work experience (i.e. qualifications) are laid down by law. In order to prevent national laws containing qualification requirements from forming too much of an obstacle to mobility Directive 2005/36/EC was adopted.
Directive 2005/36/EC, also known as the Professional Qualifications Directive, underwent extensive modernisation through Directive 2013/55/EU. Although the deadline for its implementation already passed over three years ago, the Member States are apparently still not in compliance. On 7 March the European Commission initiated infringement proceedings against almost all EU Member States. Whereas 24 Member States received reasoned opinions, two Member States received letters of formal notice. This means that Member States will have two months to reply. Should the reply prove unsatisfactory, 24 Member States may be referred to the Court of Justice while the remaining two Member States may receive reasoned opinions.
It is not the first time that such proceedings were initiated against a large number of Member States in the context of the Professional Qualifications Directive. Back in 2016, 14 Member States, among which the Benelux countries and Germany, received reasoned opinions. Back then, the procedures mainly concerned the lack of communication about the transposition of the directive into national law. Ultimately, the infringement cases initiated for the Benelux countries and Germany were closed between February 2017 and March 2018.
The present infringement proceedings concern a wide array of topics under the Professional Qualifications Directive. According to the Commission, the Member States have failed to implement correctly some core aspects of the modernisation of Directive 2013/55/EU. In particular, the proceedings concern the European Professional Card, the alert mechanism, principle of partial access, proportionality of language requirements, setting up of assistance centres, and the transparency and proportionality of regulatory obstacles.
Lee Bouwman, a vascular surgeon, works as a researcher on the implementation of new techniques in healthcare. As professor by special appointment of Clinical Engineering at the Faculty of Science and Engineering (FSE) and the Zuyderland Medical Centre, he seeks collaboration between engineers and...
In this inaugural lecture, Lars van Vliet addressed the question of how legal proceedings surrounding Nazi looted art should be shaped in a balanced way to ensure a fair trial.
“Wie als slachtoffer zijn recht zoekt, verdwaalt gemakkelijk in juristerij en een wereld waarin veel onbestraft blijft”, aldus Steven van de Put, promovendus aan de universiteit Maastricht. “Dit moet én kan anders. Het kan niet zo zijn dat individuen of groepen van individuen die iets ergs is...