The influence of guilt presumptive language on investigative interview outcomes
Research has demonstrated that interviewer beliefs about a suspect's guilt can initiate a cycle of confirmation bias. This occurs when the behavior and responses of the suspect are interpreted by the interviewer as endorsing their beliefs about suspect guilt.
Research has also shown that accusatory questions during an investigative interview are indicative of these biased beliefs. Despite these findings, researchers and practitioners rarely evaluate investigative interviews for evidence of guilt-presumptive language.
| PhD thesis written by Nicole Adams - see more Law PhD theses |
Also read
-
An Interim Evaluation of the Law on the Reflection Period
Mieke Olaerts, Tom Vos, Bastiaan Kemp, Constantijn Van Aartsen, and Rob Bauer published a study on the Law on the Reflection Period, commissioned by the WODC.
-
May it Please the Rule of Law? A Comparative Study into the Scope and Desirability of Independent Judicial Research in Contemporary Criminal Trials
PhD thesis written by Jana Trifunovic
-
Machine Learning Solutions for Improving Access to Law
PhD thesis by Antoine Louis
