Death in denial. A study into the Dutch system of postmortem investigation
Supervisor: Prof. Mr. Dr. W.L.J.M. Duijst-Heesters
Co-supervisor: Prof. Dr. J. Van der Velden
Keywords: Forensic medicine; postmortem investigations; article 2 of ECHR; death
Recent reports on forensic medicine in the Netherlands highlight the need for significant improvements in postmortem investigations. Concerns have been raised about the effectiveness of the Dutch system, which relies on the distinction between 'natural' and 'non-natural' deaths, often leading to ambiguity and errors in classification. The system places a significant burden on attending physicians, many of whom lack sufficient legal knowledge and consistency in conducting external postmortem examinations. A survey revealed that only about 20% of physicians feel competent, possess the necessary legal knowledge, and act consistently. Furthermore, studies show that only 6.7% of death certificates are completed correctly. This thesis questions the adequacy of the Dutch system, arguing that it may not meet the criteria set by the European Convention on Human Rights for an effective postmortem investigation.
Also read
-
Intercountry adoption often appears to be the ultimate humanitarian deed. However, the reality is more complex. Dr. Elvira Loibl, assistant professor at the Department of Criminal Law at Maastricht University’s Law Faculty, uncovered significant weaknesses in the Dutch intercountry adoption system. Her impactful research was awarded the annual Edmond Hustinx prize.
-
Professor Andrea Ott successfully applied for a a Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence on Crises and Emergencies in EU Integration (EmergEU) in July 2024. In the upcoming three years, the centre will explore crises and emergencies in EU integration.
-
Paula Roldán Barraza will join METRO as a PhD researcher. She will be based both at SBE and at LAW and will be supervised by Iwan Bos (SBE), Niels Philipsen (METRO) and Kalpana Tyagi (IGIR).
