Can You Sue Away Climate Change?
Supervisor: Prof. dr. Michael G. Faure
Co-supervisors: Prof. dr. Hildegard Schneider, Dr. Pauline Melin
Keywords: climate change litigation, international legal framework for GHG emissions reductions, state sovereignty, separation of powers
Climate change litigation has been – and keeps being – on the rise in recent years. Various cases have been brought before international, regional and national courts and judicial tribunals. In the scholarly debate, the opinions on climate change litigation differ considerably: For examples, supporters see it as a means to address the deficiencies of inter alia the international legal framework,while opponents argue it interferes with the separation of powers within a state. Hence, this thesis sets out to examine the potentials and limitations of climate change litigation. It establishes a framework which allows for some general conclusions on how different types of climate change litigation function and how they can help address gaps in the global governance for GHG emissions reductions. This framework may also be used to assess – past, present and future – individual cases.
Also read
-
Shuo Li guest researcher at IGIR
Dr. Shuo Li will visit IGIR for one year, between October 2025 and October 2026. Her current research focuses on China and international arbitration.
-
Globalisation & Law Network seminar with Giuseppe Martinico
On 23 October 2025, the Globalisation & Law Network, together with the Maastricht Centre for Law & Jurisprudence, organised a seminar featuring Giuseppe Martinico (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa).
-
Overriding Mandatory Rules in International Commercial Arbitration, a Comparative Study between France, Switzerland, England and Egypt
PhD thesis by Ibrahim Shehata