Can You Sue Away Climate Change?

PhD thesis

Supervisor: Prof. dr. Michael G. Faure

Co-supervisors: Prof. dr. Hildegard Schneider, Dr. Pauline Melin

Keywords: climate change litigation, international legal framework for GHG emissions reductions, state sovereignty, separation of powers

Climate change litigation has been – and keeps being – on the rise in recent years. Various cases have been brought before international, regional and national courts and judicial tribunals. In the scholarly debate, the opinions on climate change litigation differ considerably: For examples, supporters see it as a means to address the deficiencies of inter alia the international legal framework,while opponents argue it interferes with the separation of powers within a state. Hence, this thesis sets out to examine the potentials and limitations of climate change litigation. It establishes a framework which allows for some general conclusions on how different types of climate change litigation function and how they can help address gaps in the global governance for GHG emissions reductions. This framework may also be used to assess – past, present and future – individual cases.

Also read

  • IGIR seminar series

    The IGIR seminar series will be launched after the Summer break. Our aim is to offer a nice and friendly environment for staff members and visiting researchers to present their ongoing research.

    Board Room
  • Inaugural lecture Jan Willem van Prooijen

    What drives people to embrace radical conspiracy theories, sometimes with far-reaching consequences for society? During his inaugural lecture on Friday 27 June, Prof. Dr. Jan Willem van Prooijen (radicalisation, extremism, and conspiracy thinking) will address this urgent question.

    foto