jasper_nebel_mcel_master_working_paper_2021-1_pdf.pdf
(1022.22 KB, PDF)
… If the EU acts outside its competences, its acts are not covered by the Member States‟ mandate and therefore infringe the national constitutions. On the other hand, the European legal order in its uniqueness, by nature, is fully effective only when EU law is supreme over any national law, and if any kind of unilateral opt-out is excluded. The two positions that are - from their perspective - legitimate seem to be impossible to reconcile or as Garner put it: the task is nothing less than … the fundamental premises of constitutional pluralism: the whole process of discursive deliberation – as suggested by constitutional pluralism – lacks the democratic element. Hence it is questionable whether constitutional courts are generally best suited to define a constitutional order.67 This section sought to introduce the main ideas relevant for the understanding of this thesis. First, it summarised the main doctrines of the BVerfG and the CJEU. Afterwards it elaborated on the present … Staat 32 (2), 1993, p. 191-217. Di Fabio 2014 Udo di Fabio, „Karlsruhe Makes a Referral‟. German Law Journal 15 (2), 2014, p. 107 - 110 Di Lorenzo, Wefing 2020 Giovanni di Lorenzo & Heinrich Wefing, „Andreas Voßkuhle – “Erfolg ist eher kalt“‟. ZEIT Online, 2020. Retrieved via https://www.zeit.de/2020/21/andreas-vosskuhle-ezb- anleihenkaeufe-corona-krise, last visited on 10 July 2021 https://www.zeit.de/2020/21/andreas-vosskuhle-ezb-anleihenkaeufe-corona-krise …