The second-biggest democratic election in the world took place from 23 to 26 May 2019. Across four days, 426 million Europeans could vote for a new European Parliament. What, if anything, will change after these elections? And what exactly is Europe’s role in Brexit, climate change or migration? In this series, seven UM scientists shed light on the European state of affairs.

  Professor of Macroeconomics and International Monetary Economics Clemens Kool

Read our stories

“Better less control over more than the other way around”

“The EU provides us with more and greater protection for everything we hold dear, and that is important in times when countries such as China, Russia and the United States are determined to follow their own paths,” says Aalt Willem Heringa.

 Keep reading

Aalt Willem Heringa

'Only through a positive approach will Europe stand strong'

“We are economically integrated. The biggest gain from this was achieved”, says Clemens Kool. Now, Europe needs to move forward and " focus on shaping its socio-economic policies and political integration.”

 Keep reading

Clemens Kool

Taking Europe’s temperature

"We’re getting older because our health care is better than ever.” For someone working on ProHealth65+, an EU-funded programme to promote health and prevent risks, Milena Pavlova is quite positive about our demographic crisis.

 Keep reading

Milena Pavlova

Everyone’s a eurosceptic

The European Union is often criticised for being a ‘show’, far removed from its citizens. The Brussels machinery is widely seen as boring, bureaucratic and complex. “However in reality, in many things the EU is more transparent than a lot of its Member States”, says political scientist Patrick Bijsmans.

 Keep reading

Patrick Bijsmans

'High time for a new EU climate policy'

Europeans consider climate the most important issue on the European agenda. They're urging governments to take action.  New rules and regulations are required, designed and enforced by national authorities, preferably in collaboration with other countires. The EU has the framework for this, says environmental philosopher Marc Davidson.

 Keep reading

Marc Davidson

Studio Europa: with élan and Fingerspitzengefühl

What does ‘Europe’ mean to you? How does it make you feel? Maastricht University’s Studio Europa is a place of dialogue for citizens, scholars and policymakers, where you can hear about and be heard on all things European. Academic director Mathieu Segers talks about the importance of gaining a better understanding of ourselves in Europe.

 Keep reading

‘Europe should look after itself better’

‘People often say that the pace of European cooperation is too high,’ says Hylke Dijkstra, director of the master’s programme in European Studies at Maastricht University. ‘But the opposite is true. The changes aren’t happening fast enough.’ Dijkstra explains why he is disappointed in the EU.

 Keep reading

Hylke Dijkstra

Information pack

Thank you for registering for the MaCSBio Science Day 2019.

 

We have sent you an email with an overview of your registration.

 

You can now close this window.

Development of your competencies during the PhD trajectory 

The Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML) and Maastricht UMC+ aim to develop both internal and external PhD candidates into well-equipped, well-prepared and capable independent researchers able to defend their PhD thesis and function well in an international academic context.

  • Courses, Conferences and Scholarships
    During their PhD trajectory, PhD candidates should grasp the opportunity to participate in PhD courses and (international) conferences, in order to increase their discipline- and project-specific research skills and knowledge. When eager to pursue a career in academia, experience abroad is indispensable to gain experience in an international environment and expand your horizon.
  • Transferable skills
    PhD candidates should also develop transferable skills, such as communication, writing, PR & networking, time- and career-development, leadership, (project) management skills and (research) ethics. These skills are valuable assets in academia but also increase the opportunities on the job market beyond the university setting.

On the FHML/Maastricht UMC+ PhD pages, information can be found regarding the phases of a PhD at Maastricht University. Specifically, the information focusses on requirements in the starting phase, course options, contact persons for questions or problems, PhD representation and planning of the end phase.

Monitoring of PhD candidates and supervision 

All FHML/Maastricht UMC+ Schools and Institutes use the PhD TRACK system in which PhD candidates and their supervisors are registered.

The system is a monitoring tool for the progress of PhD trajectories and the quality of PhD supervision. The offices and PhD coordinators of the FHML/Maastricht UMC+ Schools and Institutes are the first contact points for both PhD candidates and supervisors.

In addition, the FHML PhD TRACK coordinator at the Research Office provides management data for the Board and other reports on PhD matters (e.g. for the VSNU (Association of Universities in the Netherlands) and NFU (The Netherlands Federation of University Medical Centres)).

Contact person
Hannerieke van der Boom, Policy advisor PhD Affairs FHML/Maastricht UMC+ and coordinator PhD TRACK system

It is very important for the Maastricht UMC+ / FHML Board that all researchers within the Maastricht UMC+ / FHML work according to existing legal and regulatory requirements. Hence, the Research Code Maastricht UMC+ was developed to guarantee independent and meticulous research. It provides those involved in research with a clear description of the rules for ethical and socially responsible conduct in scientific research. Every new researcher (including PhD students) is informed about the Research Code Maastricht UMC+ while receiving their contract.

Morover, to abide by the principles set out in the Research Code Maastricht UMC+ and encourage a broader dialogue about scientific integrity and good research practice, a comprehensive list of issues related to scientific integrity was developed. This list includes information on what to do and provides links to available websites/tools.

Within Maastricht UMC+  a Platform Scientific Integrity is installed to create a culture of awareness regarding scientific integrity. The goal of the platform is to create an approachable and safe environment in which the topic scientific integrity is discussible.


What does the Research Office do?
  • It updates the Research Code Maastricht UMC+
  • It supports Schools/Institutes working on different aspects of Scientific Integrity
  • It integrates different aspects of Scientific Integrity into one clear overall policy


Contact person
Els Swennen

Research Quality

The quality of scientific research at the Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML) is evaluated by external, independent experts every six years. In Dutch universities, research evaluations follow the national Strategy Evaluation Protocol (SEP). At FHML the evaluations are conducted at the Research Institute level. To ensure an efficient workflow, FHML has established a structured quality assurance cycle for effective research evaluation. The cycle consists out of two main parts: the SEP and the Planning & Control (P&C).

FHML Research Office research quality

Research Quality according to the SEP protocol

In accordance with the Strategy Evaluation Protocol (SEP) 2021-2027 concerning the quality of scientific research in the Netherlands, the university is obliged to compile a self-evaluation report over six year periods. The SEP aims to evaluate a Research Institute in light of its own aims and strategy.  Hereby research quality, societal relevance, and viability are evaluated to provide feedback for improvement of the strategy and performance of the Research Unit. 

Moreover, the Research Institute has to be evaluated by an external evaluation committee, which involves an External visitation in the form of a site visit. Following the site visit, the ERC will share an evaluation report including recommendations, based on which the Research Institute will create a Plan of Action (PoA)

Halfway through the six year period a Midterm review is conducted to sharpen objectives and adjust policies when required. The Midterm review is a compact version of the self-evaluation report, covering the first three years.  It focuses on the response to and follow-up of the previous evaluation committee’s recommendations, as well as any changes in mission, ambitions, strategic goals compared to the previous evaluation and the strategy for the coming three years.

After the completion of the SEP evaluation, a summary of the unit’s self-evaluation report – including the case studies, the committee’s evaluation report, and the position document of the Board will be made publicly available as part of the quality assurance cycle. Please find these documents per Research Institute below:

FHML Research Office SEP
CAPHRI - Care and Public Health Research Institute
CARIM - Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht
GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction
MERLN - Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine
MHeNs - Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute
NUTRIM - Institute for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism
SHE - School of Health Professions Education

Internal Planning & Control procedures

The FHML Planning & Control (P&C) procedures are a key component of the internal quality assurance cycle. Once a year, all FHML Research Institutes have P&C sessions with the FHML Board. 

A key aspect of these meetings is aligning on strategic choices and potential policy changes for the coming years, ensuring continuous improvement and effective monitoring. 

This continuous process helps Research Institutes remain actively engaged in quality assurance, making it a natural and structured part of their work. By collecting and reviewing key information annually, the institutes maintain an up-to-date overview of their progress, which also serves as preparation for the External visitation. 

We hereby kindly invite you to our first introductory meeting ‘Exploring Further Collaborations and Partnerships between FASoS & IDS’ on Friday 28 June 2019 from 13.30h to 17.00h at GG90-92, room: Turnzaal.

The goal of this meeting is for FASoS and IDS colleagues to introduce themselves and their work, to get to know each other's research interests and to explore opportunities for research, funding and / or education collaborations. 

Please register before Wednesday 26 June 2019. 12.00 hrs. 

Programme

13.30 Walk-in & Welcome (Cofee & Tea, Vlaai)
14.00

Welcome & Introduction - Prof. dr. S. Wyatt & Prof. dr. M. Dumontier

14.20

What is ELSI? How is it relevant for FASoS & IDS?’ - Prof. dr. D. Townend

14.30 Session I: Research interests, Needs, Collaborations
15.15 Short break (Coffee & Tea, Vlaai)
15.30

Session II: Break Out Sessions

16.15 Summary and Action Items - Moderators: Prof. dr. D. Townend and Dr. D. Meacham
16.30

Closing Remarks on ‘The Way Forward’ - Prof. dr. S. Wyatt and Prof. dr. M. Dumontier

 

We would like each of you to actively participate in this meeting by preparing 1 PPT slide to briefly introduce yourself, your research interests and previous relevant research projects, networks, experience.

In addition, we would like you to already think about possible collaborations between FASoS & IDS. If you have ideas, please do not hesitate to share them with us in your PPT.

Organizers

Lisette Bongers

Birgit Wouters

First Introductory Meeting between FASoS & IDS

The 8th Belgian-Dutch Gravitational Waves Meeting provides an opportunity for researchers in gravitational wave science to meet and update each other on the latest development in this exciting field.

Register for the 8th Belgian-Dutch Gravitational Waves Meeting