Financial Instruments and their Proportionality and Consistency under EU Law
Not just since the corona crisis have financial instruments in the form of guarantees, loans, and equity witnessed a growing popularity as a form of state aid vis-à-vis ‘regular’ grants. This thesis investigated whether the European Commission designs financial instruments and applies their legal framework in accordance with the principles of proportionality and consistency under European Union (EU) law.
It found that the Commission does not adhere to the requirements of financial instruments under the case law of the EU Courts in a consistent manner. Specifically, it does not conduct the required balancing exercise of positive and negative effects of instruments, but applies maximum amounts and screening methods as well as a checklist in its compatibility assessment under the proportionality principle. Thus, the thesis recommends the introduction of so-called manifest negative effects, which are applied in other state aid areas and are apt to solve these inconsistencies: They would indicate to stakeholders which potential negative effects could disproportionally distort competition and markets and therefore be incompatible with EU law.
Click here for the full dissertation
Click here for the live stream
Also read
-
BlueLab: preparing law students for responsible AI use
Dr. Rohan Nanda and Dr. Henrique Marcos received a Comenius Teaching Fellows ho 2026 grant for their project ‘AI Due Diligence lab for the Blue Economy (BlueLab)’.Researchers
-
One Size Fits None: Effectiveness and Acceptability of Personalized Transparency and Privacy Assistance in the United States, the European Union, and China
PhD thesis by Meihe (Iris) Xu
-
Call for applications: MCEL student trainees
MCEL seeks to recruit two new trainees for the period August 2026 – July 2027 to assist with general MCEL activities.
