Financial Instruments and their Proportionality and Consistency under EU Law
Not just since the corona crisis have financial instruments in the form of guarantees, loans, and equity witnessed a growing popularity as a form of state aid vis-à-vis ‘regular’ grants. This thesis investigated whether the European Commission designs financial instruments and applies their legal framework in accordance with the principles of proportionality and consistency under European Union (EU) law.
It found that the Commission does not adhere to the requirements of financial instruments under the case law of the EU Courts in a consistent manner. Specifically, it does not conduct the required balancing exercise of positive and negative effects of instruments, but applies maximum amounts and screening methods as well as a checklist in its compatibility assessment under the proportionality principle. Thus, the thesis recommends the introduction of so-called manifest negative effects, which are applied in other state aid areas and are apt to solve these inconsistencies: They would indicate to stakeholders which potential negative effects could disproportionally distort competition and markets and therefore be incompatible with EU law.
Click here for the full dissertation
Click here for the live stream
Also read
-
ITEM continues: Advancing cross-border cooperation and impact
ITEM enters new phase within UM Faculty of Law from 2025.
-
IGIR seminar series
The IGIR seminar series will be launched after the Summer break. Our aim is to offer a nice and friendly environment for staff members and visiting researchers to present their ongoing research.
-
Inaugural lecture Jan Willem van Prooijen
What drives people to embrace radical conspiracy theories, sometimes with far-reaching consequences for society? During his inaugural lecture on Friday 27 June, Prof. Dr. Jan Willem van Prooijen (radicalisation, extremism, and conspiracy thinking) will address this urgent question.
