Research findings challenge traditional notions of financial decision-making
We've all heard about or seen the experiment where a child is presented with a cupcake and a choice. They could either eat the cupcake now or wait a while and receive two cupcakes instead. The children almost always go for the single cupcake because they don't seem to have the patience to wait for a larger reward.
This experiment has also been conducted on adults but instead of cupcakes, money was used. With adults, however, it seemed to be the case that those that struggle financially always went for the short-term reward, while those who are relatively wealthy go for the long-term, higher reward. The conclusion was then made that being financially constrained leads to short-sighted financial decisions. However, what if that conclusion isn't as sound as we thought before?
That is the question that SBE researchers Anouk Festjens, Kimberley van der Heijden, Caroline Goukens and NYU researcher Tom Meyvishave have raised with their studies.
A guaranteed immediate payout reduces impatience
Anouk Festjens and her colleagues tested the common research setting of offering subjects the choice between $50 now or $70 later against a new alternative. Specifically, they added a smaller immediate payment up-front for both options ($50 now + $30 now vs $70 later + $30 now). This small addition completely changed the conventional outcome.
The assurance of payment significantly affects the way financially constrained individuals make decisions compared to the scenario of forcing a choice between all-now or all-later payoffs. In fact, after receiving the initial down payment, there is virtually no difference in patience among less and more wealthy individuals.
A novel insight
Their findings provide a vital addition to our understanding of how individuals make financial decisions in the real world and how financial constraint influences short-term/long-term decision making. Specifically, it challenges the assumption that financially limited individuals generally don't think long-term. Quite the contrary; they care just as much as people who are relatively wealthier - as long as they can make their ends meet.
The findings illustrate that financial decision-making is not a fixed mindset but a mechanism that can be affected depending on environmental factors. These findings provide a solid basis for further research in this field.
| The research team behind this article consists of SBE researchers Kimberley van der Heijden, Anouk Festjens and Caroline Goukens as well as Tom Meyvis from the Leonard N. Stern School of Business. If you wish to read the full article, you can do so here. |
Also read
-
Roy Broersma (CEI): Guiding Aestuarium from idea to venture
Roy Broersma, director of the Center for Entrepreneurship & Innovation (CEI) at SBE, has been closely involved in guiding Aestuarium from an early student startup to a growing venture. From spotting their potential during the Brightlands Startup Challenge supporting them through CEI.
-
Despite a less tight labour market no end to shortages in healthcare, education, and tech
Interesting new findings in the report 'The Labour Market by Education and Occupation until 2030' from the Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA) at Maastricht University.
-
Teacher Information Points at UM
UM faculties now host Teacher Information Points (TIPs) that offer local, “just-in-time” and on-demand support for teaching staff. The aim is simple: to provide help that is closely connected to day-to-day teaching practice.