International responsibility and attribution of conduct: an analysis of case law on human rights and humanitarian law
Legal rules on the attribution of conduct determine whether conduct is considered an act of the State for the purpose of holding it responsible under international law. This thesis analyses the standard and function of attribution rules in the case law of human rights courts, quasi-judicial human rights bodies, and international criminal courts with jurisdiction over violations of humanitarian law.
More specifically, this thesis analyses whether human rights courts on the one hand, and international criminal tribunals when dealing with humanitarian law on the other, have followed the standards of attribution as laid down in customary international law or, rather, whether these courts and tribunals have adopted or recognized special rules to determine whether certain conduct constitutes an act of the State. Additionally, this thesis examines whether these courts, tribunals and bodies apply attribution rules from the law of State responsibility to determine the applicable law and consequently enable the exercise of their judicial function. The latter is a question of the function of attribution rules.
Click here for the full dissertation
Click here for the live stream
Also read
-
An Interim Evaluation of the Law on the Reflection Period
Mieke Olaerts, Tom Vos, Bastiaan Kemp, Constantijn Van Aartsen, and Rob Bauer published a study on the Law on the Reflection Period, commissioned by the WODC.
-
May it Please the Rule of Law? A Comparative Study into the Scope and Desirability of Independent Judicial Research in Contemporary Criminal Trials
PhD thesis written by Jana Trifunovic
-
Machine Learning Solutions for Improving Access to Law
PhD thesis by Antoine Louis
