Search results

… in Article 2 TEU, such as the protection of fundamental rights.57 Even though the Rule of Law occupies such a significant role in the EU, it is left largely undefined by the Treaties. This was potentially one of the factors leading the former Polish Foreign Minister to promise a “horse and a box of 51 Jürgen Habermas, Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats (Suhrkamp 1992), 110-155. 52 Article 21 TEU even maintains that these values … requested the national authorities to exclude the judges unlawfully elected.127 It thus seems that there is a fundamental differences between the execution of Ástráðsson and Xero Flor. On the one hand, Ástráðsson concerned a personal deal, or an ‘exchange of favours’, between the 122 Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) App no 32772/02 (ECtHR, 20 June 2009), para 88. 123 Article 46 (1) European Convention on Human Rights. 124 Committee of Ministers, ‘1428th meeting - …

… laboratoriumonderzoek en beeldvorming) noodzakelijk voor het stellen van een beschouwende differentiaal diagnose. https://coursecatalogue.maastrichtuniversity.nl/nl/p70090777 Master Geneeskunde 10 Recommended reading Dit is de link naar Keylinks, onze online literatuurlijst. GEN8001 Year 1 Sep 2024 31 Aug 2025 Print course description ECTS credits: 0.0 Instruction language: Dutch Coordinator: F.H.M. Vanmolkot Teaching methods: Assignment(s), Work in subgroups, Patient contact, Onderwijspoli('s), …

… en beeldvorming) noodzakelijk voor het stellen van een beschouwende differentiaal diagnose. https://coursecatalogue.maastrichtuniversity.nl/nl/j.reijnders Master Geneeskunde 10 Recommended reading Dit is de link naar Keylinks, onze online literatuurlijst. GEN8001 Year 1 Sep 2023 31 Aug 2024 Print course description ECTS credits: 0.0 Instruction language: Dutch Coordinator: F.H.M. Vanmolkot Teaching methods: Assignment(s), Work in subgroups, Patient contact, Onderwijspoli('s), …

… a complete portfolio, the Joint Board of Admissions makes a first selection based on the following information: • motivation for the study programme, as expressed in a standardized motivation letter • curriculum vitae • previous academic performance • online test of basic knowledge in psychology, research methods, and statistics Depending on the evaluation of the application documents and the test results, candidates will either be directly admitted to the programme or invited for an interview with …

… 1:43 PM Mail - Pers, (BU) - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/pers@maastrichtuniversity.nl/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0AbGsVialH70%2BhUnd%2… 1/13 Promoties, oraties en benoemingen aan de Universiteit Maastricht Klik hier voor de online versie Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences benoemd tot hoogleraar Gezondheid en Welzijn bij mensen met Lage Sociaal Economische Positie Titel van de oratie: "Stap voor stap naar een gezonder leven voor iedereen" Vrijdag 19 maart 2021, …

… Ø Gezamenlijke OC-bijeenkomst over werkdruk: najaar 2020 Ø Ineke Wolfhagen /Miriam Oude Egbrink uitnodigen m.b.t. beleidszaken/lange termijnstrategie: najaar 2020 Ø Christel van Gool / Jascha de Nooijer: Innovation budget MT HS for the development of online education / discuss to do a questionnaire with: najaar 2020 Ø EPC’s education afternoon 2020-2021: January 2021 Aandachtspunten 2020-2021: IWIO is de software voor het verzamelen van (standaard) blokevaluaties die vanaf komend academisch jaar …

… Table 4.1 Projected costs of cigarettes with 5% yearly tax increase 2015 2017 2020 2030 2040 2050 Minimum tax 1000 cigarettes €181.53 €190.61 €243.27 €359.42 €585.45 €953.64 Minimum tax pack 19 cigarettes €3.45 €3.62 €4.19 €6.83 €11.12 €18.12 Trading margin* €1.67 €1.67 €1.67 €1.67 €1.67 €1.67 VAT pack 19 cigarettes €1.08 €1.11 €1.23 €1.78 €2.69 €4.16 Total cost €6.20 €6.40 €7.09 €10.28 €15.48 €23.95 % tax of total cost 55.7 56.6 59.1 66.4 71.4 75.7 % tax+VAT of total cost 73.0 73.9 76.4 … Table 4.2 Projected costs of cigarettes with 10% yearly tax increase 2015 2017 2020 2030 2040 2050 Minimum tax 1000 cigarettes €181.53 €199.68 €265.78 €689.36 €1788.02 €4637.67 Minimum tax pack 19 cigarettes €3.45 €3.79 €5.05 €13.10 €33.97 €88.12 Trading margin* €1.67 €1.67 €1.67 €1.67 €1.67 €1.67 VAT pack 19 cigarettes €1.08 €1.15 €1.41 €3.10 €7.49 €8.86 Total cost €6.20 €6.61 €8.13 €17.87 €43.13 €108.64 % tax of total cost 55.7 57.4 62.1 73.3 78.8 81.1 % tax+VAT of total cost 73.0 74.7 79.5 … 5.2. 80 Table5.2 Projected costs of cigarettes with 5% yearly tax increase 2015 2017 2020 2030 2040 2050 Minimum tax 1000 cigarettes €181.53 €190.61 €243.27 €359.42 €585.45 €953.64 Minimum tax pack 19 cigarettes €3.45 €3.62 €4.19 €6.83 €11.12 €18.12 Trading margin* €1.67 €1.67 €1.67 €1.67 €1.67 €1.67 VAT pack 19 cigarettes €1.08 €1.11 €1.23 €1.78 €2.69 €4.16 Total cost €6.20 €6.40 €7.09 €10.28 €15.48 €23.95 % tax of total cost 55.7 56.6 59.1 66.4 71.4 75.7 % tax+VAT of total cost 73.0 73.9 76.4 …

… Randomization will be stratified based on sex (male versus female) and number of falls during the past year (1 versus 2 or more). This stratification will result in four different strata. The randomization sequence will be generated using an online random number generator. The allocation will be concealed by using sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelopes. The person preparing the allocation concealment mechanism will be a different person than the one enrolling the subjects and … using a 1:1 ratio stratified block randomization (block sizes 2 and 4). Randomization was stratified based on sex (male/female) and number of falls during the previous year (1 versus 2 or more falls). The randomization sequence was generated using an online random number generator. Allocation was concealed by using sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelopes. The allocation sequence list was kept in a locked drawer, which could only be accessed by the principal investigator. Statistical analysis … bound Upper Bound Constant 1.000 0.339 0.004 0.325 1.675 Group -0.308 0.492 0.53 -1.287 0.672 The association between group and ΔFES-I was explored in a similar approach, with the same potential interacting or confounding variables (baseline FES-I was exchanged for baseline Mini-BESTest). Table S6.2 shows the results of univariate linear regression, with no significant association between group and ΔFES-I. No significant interaction effects were found. The addition of age resulted in a 11,1% change …