Search results

… UK iBMJ, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9JR, UK jFaculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK kMBP Holding, Heerlen, The Netherlands Accepted 27 November 2023; Published online 3 December 2023 Abstract Objectives: To determine the reproducibility of biomedical systematic review search strategies. Study Design and Setting: A cross-sectional reproducibility study was conducted on a random sample of 100 systematic reviews … than 1,000% between the originally reported number of results and the reproduction. Only one systematic review article provided the necessary search details to be fully reproducible. Conclusion: Systematic review search reporting is poor. To correct this will require a multifaceted response from authors, peer re- viewers, journal editors, and database providers. � 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license … Chapter of the Medical Li- brary Assocation; 2021. [30] Nguyen PY, Astell-Burt T, Rahimi-Ardabili H, Feng X. Green space quality and health: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(21):11028. [31] Lopez-Nicolas R, Lopez-Lopez JA, Rubio-Aparicio M, S�anchez- Meca J. A meta-review of transparency and reproducibility-related reporting practices in published meta-analyses on clinical psychologi- cal interventions (2000-2020). Behav Res Methods 2021;54:334e49. [32] Sampson M, …