An Interim Evaluation of the Law on the Reflection Period
Our ICGI colleagues Mieke Olaerts, Tom Vos, Bastiaan Kemp, Constantijn van Aartsen, and Rob Bauer published a study on the Law on the Reflection Period, commissioned by the WODC.
This research project is an interim evaluation of the Law on the Reflection Period. This allows the management board of Dutch listed companies, with the approval of the supervisory board, to invoke a reflection period of up to 250 days when shareholders put on the agenda the appointment, suspension or dismissal (or an amendment to the articles of association of provisions relating to the appointment, suspension or dismissal) of members of the management or supervisory board, or when a public offer has been announced or made (Art. 2:114b of the Dutch Civil Code). The provision applies to all Dutch companies whose shares are listed at a stock exchange in the Netherlands or at a foreign stock exchange.
According to the explanatory memorandum, the purpose of invoking a reflection period is to enable better decision-making that takes into account the interests of various stakeholders. One of the expectations at the time of drafting was that not only invoking the reflection period will have such an effect, but that the mere possibility of invoking the reflection period may (already) achieve a better result for stakeholders (the so-called preventive effect).
The research project focuses on the following research questions:
- What is the intended purpose of the reflection period, and in what way should that purpose be achieved with which safeguards?
- How often, in what manner and why has the reflection period been applied and has there been concurrence with other defensive measures?
- Does the reflection period have a preventive effect? If so, how; if not, why not?
- To what extent is there a link between the (preventive) effect of the reflection period and the investment and incorporation climate in the Netherlands?
To answer the research questions, the literature was studied, a survey and interviews were conducted, and data were collected on the possible application of the reflection period by Dutch companies (listed domestically and abroad), takeover bids (including non-financial covenants), defensive measures, shareholder activism, new listings of Dutch companies on Euronext markets, cross-border reincorporations, and the reaction of stock markets to the introduction of the reflection period.
Also read
-
Inaugural lecture Jan Willem van Prooijen
What drives people to embrace radical conspiracy theories, sometimes with far-reaching consequences for society? During his inaugural lecture on Friday 27 June, Prof. Dr. Jan Willem van Prooijen (radicalisation, extremism, and conspiracy thinking) will address this urgent question.
-
Where Law Meets Pop Culture: A Creative Space for Exploration
From hip-hop to Victor Hugo, and historical fiction to classic cinema: What do these things have in common with the study of law, you might think? At Maastricht University’s Faculty of Law, a growing group of researchers and students is exploring exactly that and even more.
-
Innovative Education in Personal and Family Law
Thanks to the SURF Incentive Scheme for Open and Online Education (still available at the time), Gwen Noteborn (university lecturer in personal and family law at Maastricht University), Claudia Hocks and Janneke Hendrix (lecturers in law at Zuyd University of Applied Sciences) were able to get...