Avoid high-heeled shoes at a standing table - Pilot project with standing tutorials
A standing tutorial: is it healthier, better for group dynamics and learning? Experiments are being carried out at University College Maastricht and in the Maastricht Science Programme. “Sometimes I have classes from eight to half past six in the evening. Standing between sessions keeps me awake.” A tip: kick high-heeled shoes under the table.
Seven students from the Maastricht Science Programme who have gathered this Thursday morning for a tutorial, will be talking about tropical ecology. Ordinary building: Minderbroedersberg 6. Ordinary classroom: square, four tables, eight chairs, and a whiteboard. A little on the boring side.
Just before eleven, a few students have already dropped into chairs. Roy Erkens, lecturer and researcher, enters the room. He presses a button and up comes the desk. Students follow his example; in no time, there are four standing tables. The chairs serve as racks for coats and bags for the next two hours.
It was Erkens who introduced the standing tutorial last year. “I sometimes spent hours teaching in one day, I became tired of sitting inactively. That is when I started standing up. Students did it too. The electrically adjustable desks are wonderful to work at, but in the beginning I just used a regular standing table.” He points to a folding model resting against the wall. Of course I was a little sceptical, afraid that the students wouldn’t like it, but my wife said: ‘They stand in a pub for hours, don’t they?’”
Read the rest of the article in Observant, November 2015.
Go to EDLAB's Education That Moves You project page.
Also read
-
AI Café: students in conversation about AI and education
AI Café was created as a student-led community for open, insightful conversations about artificial intelligence in education. The first meeting on 26 February 2026 brought that idea to life with students sharing their experiences with AI.
-
From shortcut to study partner: Student approaches to GenAI
Donna Carroll reports on a UM student survey showing that students’ unsupervised use of GenAI is often driven by opportunity, pressure and rationalisation, in line with the classic fraud triangle and helping explain why some outsource their work while others use AI more constructively.
-
"Don’t lose the human element": Jason Goulah on education, AI, and the question of what makes us human
Following his keynote at the Sixth Global Citizenship Education Symposium, Jason Goulah continued the conversation in a discussion with an EDLAB research assistant, focusing on a central question: how can education remain meaningfully human in an age of artificial intelligence?
