Secretariat
Email info-hsr@maastrichtuniversity.nl
Postal address
P.O. Box 616
6200 MD Maastricht
The Netherlands
Visiting address
Duboisdomein 30
6229 GT Maastricht
The Netherlands
Join Maastricht University's Brussels Community!
UM Campus Brussels is happy to invite all UM staff, students, and alumni to join UM's Brussels Community. As a member of the community, you will be able to:
- Receive invitations to upcoming activities organised at Maastricht University Campus Brussels
- Join discussions with academics and practitioners on EU trending topics, such as during the 'What's up, EU?' or the 'RELAY Project' series
- Speak and share your expertise at one of our many events
- Network with other UM staff, students and alumni living in and around Brussels and join in an evening discussion after work, for example the 'Fireplace Talks'?, and get acquainted with other members of the community, for example through the podcast series 'Stories from Brussels'
- Use the Campus Brussels facilities at our Academic Co-working Space or our meeting rooms for your events
Click here to sign up to UM's Brussels Community mailing list to keep up to date of activities for staff, students, and alumni in Brussels!
Yes, I would like to be updated on the next Problem-Based Learning Presentation and live Q&A.
Please keep me updated
Yes, I would like to be updated on the next presentation and live Q&A.
Please keep me updated
A review by Michael Shackleton of the 'Hitler’s Cosmopolitan Bastard: Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi and his Vision of Europe'
Even amongst those well-versed in the history of European integration, the name of Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi (RCK for short here and in the book) is relatively unknown. This is particularly true in the anglosphere where until now there was no biography in English of this remarkable 20th century figure. Martyn Bond would have already done a considerable service by producing such a biography but in fact the book offers much more and can be read with equal profit by specialists as well as the general reader.
RCK’s life was full of incident from the moment of his birth in Japan, the son of an Austro-Hungarian diplomat and a Japanese geisha, in 1894 until his death in 1972 very shortly before the accession of the UK to the European Economic Community. He developed the skills of a supremely able multilingual networker who was on first name terms with many of the Presidents, Prime Ministers and Foreign Ministers in Europe and further afield. He was relentless in organising conferences and finding any other opportunity to get the chance to persuade such leaders of the virtue of his vision of the future of Europe, whether it was Mussolini, Stresemann or Briand before the Second World War or Truman, Churchill or De Gaulle after it. It was a kind of back-handed compliment that Hitler referred to him as a “cosmopolitan bastard” and ensured that his works were among those proscribed and burnt. Worse could have befallen RCK and his wife after the Anschluss when they were pursued by the Gestapo from Vienna but managed to escape by a roundabout route to Switzerland thanks to an escort provided by Mussolini through Italy!
His vision of Europe was set out in Pan-Europa, published in 1923, which soon became a best seller across the continent, running to several editions. In the book RCK laid out his geopolitical ideas of a united European continent able to stand up to or alongside the other major powers in the world. On the basis of the book and with the help of his Austrian wife, a famous actress of the day, he set up the Pan-Europa Union with individual branches across Europe whose members gathered for regular conferences, the first in Vienna in 1926, bringing together 2000 delegates from Europe’s political and cultural elite. His ideas offered a view of the future that proved attractive to many, especially those not tempted by either the Communist example of the Soviet Union or the rising tide of fascism. (continue reading after the video)
Michael Shackleton, University of Maastricht, April 2021
Watch the full recording of the book presentation
Continue reading the review of the book by Michael Shackleton
The book reminds us that such ideas are not some remnant of a bygone era but are relevant to those concerned about the development of the European Union today. This is well-illustrated by the tension that existed between RCK and Jean Monnet, whose Memoirs famously make no mention of his contemporary, even though they moved in similar circles. Whereas Monnet believed in the importance of supranational institutions as a way of moving European integration forward but insisted that this could only be done gradually, through small steps, RCK was not interested in institutional details but looked to the bigger picture and grand gestures, designed to set up a federation or confederation. He backed De Gaulle’s Fouchet Plan in 1962 because he saw it as a way of improving Europe’s profile on the world stage and was not bothered by the fact that it implied setting aside the views of smaller countries and side-lining the Commission. For him it was the goal not the method that counted, an argument that continues to rage within the EU. Is it enough that the largest countries, in particular France and Germany, agree on a new initiative such as the European Recovery Fund or does the EU need to ensure that other voices are heard, even if the result is much slower, sub-optimal progress? As the EU enters ever more areas that are sensitive for national politicians, the tension inherent in the argument between RCK and Monnet becomes even more visible than it was in their era.
The book points to another critical issue for those concerned with the process of European integration, namely the extent to which it should be a top-down affair or rather bottom-up. With the EU starting up the Conference on the Future of Europe, it is an article of faith that European leaders must listen to what their citizens say about the next steps to be taken. It cannot be decided from the top and handed to a grateful citizenry. We live in an era that sees Citizens’ Assemblies as a way of both articulating and aggregating opinion. RCK took a very different approach. For him it was central that European leaders commit to a unified Continent and that they promote it by developing a common currency, a single flag, an anthem, all ideas that he had put forward in his book and which he saw as creating a world of European patriots, committed to a wider community than simply their own national world. His aim was to make this idea more attractive than the alternatives that were on offer, particularly before the Second World War. As we know, he failed but the question remains as to whether his more directive approach is more likely to be successful in the longer-term than attempts that seek to reconcile competing interests in a more consensual manner. We cannot escape the dilemma that RCK identified and still have to make a choice.
Last but not least, RCK was very exercised by the question of the boundary of Europe and in particular, the position of the UK. In his 1923 book he considered Britain to be an ally but outside the unified Europe but his opinion fluctuated throughout his life. He spent much time with Churchill trying to persuade him that Britain should be part of the European experiment and Churchill repaid the compliment by citing RCK by name in his famous speech in Zurich in 1946. RCK was confronted by much elite opinion in the UK that considered him to be a hopeless idealist who did not understand Britain’s very different trajectory and above all, the significance of the British Empire. It has a very familiar feel in the present day when the idea of “Global Britain” is held up as a formula that offers a separate path from that offered by the EU.
This biography is then much more than an account of the life of RCK. It provides an insight into the first arguments about the nature of European integration that followed the Great War, arguments which continue to resonate today. So don’t hesitate to read this book.
One of the recommendations of the HSR COVID Coping Group was to establish a blueprint or matrix to assist juniors and new colleagues in finding a contact person for specific topics. After all, not all of us are acquainted with DUB30 the way it used to be. See also the article 'Coping in times of COVID; analysis and recommendations' by Gili Yaron in the internal HSR newsletter 41.
In order to make this knowledge matrix, we ask everyone to please fill out the web form below. This includes all the HSR staff, from the support staff up to the professors. The knowledge matrix will only be distributed among the HSR staff.
Furthermore, mention your main topics but be concise. The question marks display examples.
If you have any questions, please e-mail these to s.koene@maastrichtuniversity.nl
The HSR COVID Coping Group
HSR Knowledge matrix
General
About the position:
Your tasks?
- Edit the recorded audio files using audio editing software
- Edit the accessible transcript to be published simultaneously
- Publish edited episodes
- Develop and manage the Woke as Science online platform including the website, and social media accounts with regular posts (based on the content of the episodes)
What are we looking for?
- A proactive student who is interested in digital media content creation (written and visual)
- Enrolled at UM or any other Dutch university or Hogeschool and available for at least 1 year as of 1 September 2023
- Good organizational and planning skills
- Affinity with graphic design (e.g. Canva), and subsequent social media production/management
- Written and verbal communication skills in English
We additionally welcome:
- Experience with audio editing software (e.g. Descript)
- Affinity to web-editing (e.g. Drupal, WordPress, Tripolis)
- A working knowledge of Dutch (level B1minus/B2)
What we offer:
A fun and challenging job in a supportive environment where your tasks as a student assistant will be supervised by the D&I Office.
- 5 hours a week contracted by InterUM
- Salary scale 6 (CAO-UNL) as of €12,44 per hour
- Holiday allowance and annual bonus
- Flexibility accounting for your work-study schedule
- Hybrid working
Please Note:
- If you are a non-EU/EER student, you need a Dutch work permit (via UWV)
- You need a Dutch health insurance to be eligible to work in the Netherlands
- The start date for this role is August/September 2023
Application and procedure
How to apply:
Please submit your application by 6 August 2023 23:59, by email to dr. Constance Sommerey diversity@maastrichtuniversity.nl including:
- Subject: Application Student Assistant WaS
- A Curriculum Vitae (CV)
- A motivation letter (max 1 page) addressing the 9 bullet points concerning ‘the tasks’ and ‘what we are looking for’, and anything from the ‘We additionally welcome’ section.
For more information on the podcast, please see our website.
Procedure:
You will hear back from us whether you are selected for an interview by 18 August 2023. Interviews will take place end of August.
Maastricht University values diversity within its community and encourages you (with your background and your experiences) to apply.