We Can Work It Out – A study into an improved interpretation of current EU law to address VAT double (non )taxation caused by divergent national decisions
Written by: Mathijs Klemm
Supervisors: Prof Dr. A.J. van Doesum and Dr. F.J.G. Nellen
Keywords: Double(non‑)taxation, VAT, EU Law, Divergent national decisions
When companies trade across EU borders, they can face conflicting tax decisions from different countries. One country may charge VAT while another does not, leading to either double taxation or no taxation at all. Both situations distort fair competition within the EU’s internal market, and double taxation can even interfere with basic rights such as property and legal protection.
In this PhD research, it is examined why these inconsistencies arise and how they can be challenged. Rather than proposing new laws or institutions, this work explores how existing rules can be applied more effectively. By focusing on key principles of EU law – including cooperation between authorities, fairness in taxation, and the protection of taxpayers’ rights – the research demonstrates how the current VAT system can be interpreted and applied more consistently across Member States, helping to prevent and resolve diverging decisions in cross-border cases.
Also read
-
MCLJ Annual Conference 2026: “Law in a changing world”
Legal ordering is changing, both globally and domestically. Some talk about a post-American order, others about a new order of Great Powers such as China, Russia or the United States. A power-based concept of law is being put forward, one more characteristic of other centuries. Ecological and techno
-
In the Flow of Fire: The Protection of Water During Armed Conflict under Public
PhD thesis by Meng Wang
-
Supravitality, Post-mortem muscle excitability
PhD thesis by Eric Stigter