Can You Sue Away Climate Change?
Supervisor: Prof. dr. Michael G. Faure
Co-supervisors: Prof. dr. Hildegard Schneider, Dr. Pauline Melin
Keywords: climate change litigation, international legal framework for GHG emissions reductions, state sovereignty, separation of powers
Climate change litigation has been – and keeps being – on the rise in recent years. Various cases have been brought before international, regional and national courts and judicial tribunals. In the scholarly debate, the opinions on climate change litigation differ considerably: For examples, supporters see it as a means to address the deficiencies of inter alia the international legal framework,while opponents argue it interferes with the separation of powers within a state. Hence, this thesis sets out to examine the potentials and limitations of climate change litigation. It establishes a framework which allows for some general conclusions on how different types of climate change litigation function and how they can help address gaps in the global governance for GHG emissions reductions. This framework may also be used to assess – past, present and future – individual cases.
Also read
-
May it Please the Rule of Law? A Comparative Study into the Scope and Desirability of Independent Judicial Research in Contemporary Criminal Trials
PhD thesis written by Jana Trifunovic
-
Machine Learning Solutions for Improving Access to Law
PhD thesis by Antoine Louis
-
Globalisation & Law Network seminar with Filipe Brito Bastos
On 3 April 2025, the Globalisation & Law Network hosted a seminar featuring Dr. Filipe Brito Bastos, Assistant Professor at NOVA School of Law.