Can You Sue Away Climate Change?
Supervisor: Prof. dr. Michael G. Faure
Co-supervisors: Prof. dr. Hildegard Schneider, Dr. Pauline Melin
Keywords: climate change litigation, international legal framework for GHG emissions reductions, state sovereignty, separation of powers
Climate change litigation has been – and keeps being – on the rise in recent years. Various cases have been brought before international, regional and national courts and judicial tribunals. In the scholarly debate, the opinions on climate change litigation differ considerably: For examples, supporters see it as a means to address the deficiencies of inter alia the international legal framework,while opponents argue it interferes with the separation of powers within a state. Hence, this thesis sets out to examine the potentials and limitations of climate change litigation. It establishes a framework which allows for some general conclusions on how different types of climate change litigation function and how they can help address gaps in the global governance for GHG emissions reductions. This framework may also be used to assess – past, present and future – individual cases.
Also read
-
Taking the ICJ Advisory Opinion on Climate Change a Leap Forward: UN General Assembly Adopts Landmark Resolution With Large Majority
On 21 May 2026 the UN General Assembly (UNGA) adopted a resolution on the International Court of Justice’s landmark advisory opinion on climate change.
-
MCHR Master's Research-in-Progress Presentations
The MCHR hosted the first edition of the Master's Research-in-Progress PresentationsStudents
-
Ambassador Dren Doli on The Duality and the Transformation of Kosovo-Serbia Dialogue into an Enlargement Mechanism
Ambassador Lecture Series with Dren Doli, Ambassador of Kosovo to the Kingdom of the Netherlands