PhD Defence Romy Richter

Supervisor: Prof. dr. Trudy van der Weijden

Co-supervisors: Dr. Esther Giroldi, Dr. Jesse Jansen

Keywords: Shared Decision Making, risk communication, patient preferences, health literacy 
 

"From dialogue to decision: Exploring medical options, benefits and harms, and patient preferences in different clinical contexts"


This dissertation explores how to enhance shared decision-making (SDM) in healthcare by examining the communication of medical options, their potential benefits and harms (option talk and risk communication), and patient preference elicitation. Communicating these aspects can be abstract and complex, posing challenges in clinical practice. Previous research highlights healthcare professionals' need for clear communication strategies and supportive tools, particularly for engaging patients with limited health literacy in SDM. 

The dissertation provides insights and recommendations for effective risk communication strategies and examines how clinical contexts influence this process. It incorporates perspectives from key stakeholders, including clinicians, experts, and patients with limited health literacy. Additionally, it evaluates Patient Decision Aids, tools designed to support option talk and risk communication. This dissertation also explored the use of the Outcome Prioritization Tool (OP) to support the often-abstract task of eliciting patient preferences in practice. 

Click here for the livestream.

Also read

  • Online PhD defence Da Hae Jung

    "Olfactory System Vulnerability In Alzheimer’s Disease: A Multidisciplinary Study Decoding Alzheimer’s through the Nosebrain Axis"

    10 Nov
  • PhD defence Vinidhra Shankar

    "Well, Well, Well: What have we grown here? Scaling up bioengineered embryo models for biomedical applications"

    10 Nov
  • PhD defence Lieve Vonken

    "Unraveling How Healthcare Professionals Perceive Antibiotic Resistance: From Perceptions to Practice"

    12 Nov