Exploring Human-Object Relationships in Art Markets

PhD thesis

Supervisor: Dr. Donna Yates, Prof. dr. Simon Mackenzie

Key words: Commodities-related crimes; sensory criminology; more-than-human crime;  nonhuman 
affects

This study examined how non-economic influences—such as senses, atmospheres, and materiality—shape human relationships with objects in contexts that may involve harmful or illegal behavior. It aimed to incorporate these often-overlooked sensorial and atmospheric components into criminological theories, emphasising the significance of materiality in understanding commodities-related crimes. 

The research challenges dominant conceptions of commodities-related crime and illicit markets, where objects are often seen as passive and interchangeable, and human decisions are viewed as primarily motivated by economic factors. Instead, this study highlights the active role of objects in shaping human experiences. The findings show that objects are not merely targets of collecting or desire. They contribute to creating and influencing meaningful human experiences, impacting individuals on physical, sensory, and emotional levels. 

The relationship between humans and objects is dynamic, forming new and emotive connections through their interaction. By focusing on the interplay between humans, objects, and atmospheres, this study provides fresh insights into the material and sensorial dimensions of crime, offering a more comprehensive perspective on the complexities of illicit markets.

Also read