Glynis Bogaard (G.)
Research profile
- Lie detection
- Verbal veracity assessment methods:
- Criteria Based Content Analysis
- Scientific Content Analysis
- Reality Monitoring
Key publications
-
Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., Vrij, A., & Merckelbach, H. (2016). Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) Cannot Distinguish Between Truthful and Fabricated Accounts of a Negative Event. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00243More information about this publication
-
Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., Vrij, A., & Merckelbach, H. (2016). Strong, but Wrong: Lay People's and Police Officers' Beliefs about Verbal and Nonverbal Cues to Deception. PLOS ONE, 11(6), Article e0156615. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156615More information about this publication
-
Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., & Vrij, A. (2014). Using an Example Statement Increases Information but Does Not Increase Accuracy of CBCA, RM, and SCAN. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 11(2), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1409More information about this publication
-
Bogaard, G., Meijer, E., Vrij, A., Broers, N., & Merckelbach, H. (2014). SCAN is largely driven by 12 criteria: results from sexual abuse statements. Psychology Crime & Law, 20(5), 430-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.793338More information about this publication
-
Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., Vrij, A., & Merckelbach, H. L. G. J. (2011). Leugenaars praten anders. De Psycholoog, 46, 10-19.More information about this publication