Search results

… refers to the term teacher, it is implied that this is a scholarly teacher, following the ideal type of Ruth Graham, who designed a career framework for university teaching based on extensive research.1 According to Graham, a scholarly teacher is someone who creates optimal conditions for student learning, engages with colleagues, is 1 R. Graham (2018), The Career Framework for University Teaching: Background and Overview (London: Royal Academy of Engineering). Availabe at: … proud of its unique feathers, UM is proud of its teachers for their personal talents and contributions to the university. Figure 1 – Different roles of a teacher Each of the six feathers of the peacock (see figure 1) represents a teacher role that someone might want to develop further. Depending on one’s talents and aspirations, teachers can choose their own path in how to develop these roles and the related competencies. One does not need to excel at everything, though a minimum level in each is … to simplify and convey complex matters in a way that engages students. They have the ability to enthuse and motivate students to get more out of themselves than they had expected, and they teach students how to learn. This is done face-to-face, in online settings or through a combinationof both, blended learning. This teacher ensures inclusiveness and diversity in the classroom. They respect students’ input in improving education, enter into dialogues with students about education and coach …

… klinische testcentra in de Euregio. Deze centra vormen een inspirerende, praktijkgerichte omgeving om samen met patiënten nieuwe revalidatie-technologische producten en concepten te ontwikkelen, testen, onderzoeken en valideren. Tijdens een afsluitend online symposium vandaag presenteerden klinische experts, organisaties en onderzoekers gezamenlijke ideeën, ontwikkelingen en producten op het gebied van revalidatietechnologie. Deze zijn de afgelopen 3 jaar in co-creatie via het zogenaamde … waar Adelante deel van uitmaakt, verbindt gezondheidszorg, innovatie van revalidatietechnologie en wetenschappelijke kennis met de steun van het Interreg V-A Euregio Maas-Rijn-programma (www.interregemr.eu). Op 20 april was het afsluitend online symposium “Innovation and implementation of complex rehabilitation technology: state-of-the-art, ideas and solutions” georganiseerd voor professionals uit de revalidatiesector en de industrie. Op 23 april jongstleden promoveerde Thijs van …

… op herinneringen S13.1 Narratieve competentie in levensloopperspectief: De rol van leeftijd bij het beschrijven van heri S13.2 Veranderingen in prosodische spraakkenmerken als indicator van depressie in een life-review inter S13.3 Hoe wordt een online cursus life-review ervaren door deelnemers? Een kwalitatieve studie S14 Interventies voor eenzame en sociaal geïsoleerde ouderen: ervaringen met formele en informele vor S14.1 Netwerkversterking door burgertriades S14.2 Sociale activering van … Problemen en prioriteiten in mondzorg en mondgezondheid van thuiswonende ouderen in Nederland - e PC22 Aanpak eenzaamheid ouderen: Nieuwe rollen voor vrijwilliger en professional Groep D: Technologie voor goede zorg PD23 Omgaan met eenzaamheid: een online vriendschapscursus voor 50-plussers PD24 PERSSILAA project: een nieuw service model voor ouderen om te screenen op en ter voorkoming van k PD25 Telemonitoring voor vroegtijdige signalering en behandeling van ondervoeding bij ouderen: studieo …

… the requirements specified under 4a or 4b. a. A research internship at the UM (internal internship) needs two supervisors with a PhD. However, there is an exception for PhD-students and for UM lecturers without a PhD. When they completed the UTQ workshop ‘assessment’, they can be second supervisor. When in addition, the PhD student or the UM lecturer without PhD already supervised two research internships as a second supervisor, they can also act as first supervisor. b. In case of a research … or Board of Examiners member; c. has copied or attempted to copy from another student, or has provided the opportunity to copy; d. has collaborated on a graded assignment, paper or practical, whereas this was not explicitly allowed; e. has posed as someone else or let someone else pose as the student; f. has misled, or at least attempted to mislead or provided the opportunity to mislead an invigilator, an examiner, a corrector or the Board of Examiners with respect to the exam; g. has used an obfuscation method in submitted work that is likely to have the effect that Rules and Regulations Master in Forensic Psychology 2022-2023 8 plagiarism checking tools do not work optimally; h. has disregarded the instructions of the invigilator or the instructions for the exam (component) such that an unfair advantage might have been obtained; i. has performed actions or omissions which make it …

… mentor. Article 2.4 Determination and examination of the level of the end-terms 1. The level of the end-terms is determined at the end of every course year. 2. In their annual transition meeting at the end of the academic year, the Board of Examiners checks the results of all students and may decide on exemption to the requirements and if so grant admission to the higher course year. The program management and the student advisors are consulted before or during the meeting on issues of students’ … 5 Article 2.6 Written assignments and master’s thesis 1. The requirements with regard to papers that are part of a course and the thesis will be announced in the respective assessment plan in the Student Portal. 2. All written assignments must be checked for plagiarism using Ouriginal or another plagiarism- screening program approved by the Board of Examiners. Students are required to upload the final version of their thesis via fhmlweb.nl as well as via the Student Portal. 3. The master's … or Board of Examiners member; c) has copied or attempted to copy from another student, or has provided the opportunity to copy; d) has collaborated on a graded assignment, paper or practical, whereas this was not explicitly allowed; e) has posed as someone else or let someone else pose as him/her; f) has misled, or at least attempted to mislead or provided the opportunity to mislead an invigilator, an examiner, a corrector, or the Board of Examiners with respect to the exam; g) has used an …

… have to be assigned, who meet criteria. a. A research internship at the UM (internal internship) needs two supervisors with a PhD. However, there is an exception for PhD-students and for UM lecturers without a PhD. When they completed the UTQ workshop ‘assessment’, they can be second supervisor. When in addition, the PhD student or the UM lecturer without PhD already supervised two research internships as a second supervisor, they can also act as first supervisor. b. In case of a research … or Board of Examiners member; c. has copied or attempted to copy from another student, or has provided the opportunity to copy; d. has collaborated on a graded assignment, paper or practical, whereas this was not explicitly allowed; e. has posed as someone else or let someone else pose as the student; f. has misled, or at least attempted to mislead or provided the opportunity to mislead an invigilator, an examiner, a corrector or the Board of Examiners with respect to the exam. g. has used an obfuscation method in submitted work that is likely to have the effect that plagiarism checking tools do not work optimally; h. has disregarded the instructions of the invigilator or the instructions for the exam (component) such that an unfair advantage might have been obtained; i. has performed actions or omissions which make it …

… mentor. Article 2.4 Determination and examination of the level of the end-terms 1. The level of the end-terms is determined at the end of every course year. 2. In their annual transition meeting at the end of the academic year, the Board of Examiners checks the results of all students and may decide on exemption to the requirements and if so grant admission to the higher course year. The program management and the student advisors are consulted before or during the meeting on issues of students’ … 5 Article 2.6 Written assignments and master’s thesis 1. The requirements with regard to papers that are part of a course and the thesis will be announced in the respective assessment plan in the Student Portal. 2. All written assignments must be checked for plagiarism using Ouriginal or another plagiarism- screening program approved by the Board of Examiners. Students are required to upload the final version of their thesis via fhmlweb.nl as well as via the Student Portal. 3. The master's … or Board of Examiners member; c) has copied or attempted to copy from another student, or has provided the opportunity to copy; d) has collaborated on a graded assignment, paper or practical, whereas this was not explicitly allowed; e) has posed as someone else or let someone else pose as him/her; f) has misled, or at least attempted to mislead or provided the opportunity to mislead an invigilator, an examiner, a corrector, or the Board of Examiners with respect to the exam; g) has used an …