Taking the ICJ Advisory Opinion on Climate Change a Leap Forward: UN General Assembly Adopts Landmark Resolution With Large Majority
On 21 May 2026 the UN General Assembly (UNGA) adopted a resolution on the International Court of Justice’s landmark advisory opinion on climate change (document A/80/L.65). Adopted by a large majority of states, the resolution translates the ICJ’s legal interpretation into a policy commitment, including with respect to the energy transition.
Focus
Building on the Court’s findings, the resolution calls on states to take specific energy-related action to meet the 1.5°C target in line with science (see figure below). The resolution also urges states to strengthen cooperative efforts to address the climate crisis. States should therefore welcome it as a call to reinvigorate cooperation across a range of climate-related policy areas, including within the climate and trade regimes.
Hailing the resolution as a “powerful affirmation” of international law, climate justice, science, and states’ responsibility to protect people from the climate crisis, the UN Secretary-General António Guterres emphasized that “[t]hose least responsible for climate change are paying the highest price,” and called on the world to end this injustice.
IGIR’s sustainability research is committed to supporting states and other stakeholders in responding to this urgent call to action by providing science-based input for an inclusive energy and climate transition.
Relevant links
Also read
-
MCHR Master's Research-in-Progress Presentations
The MCHR hosted the first edition of the Master's Research-in-Progress PresentationsStudents
-
Ambassador Dren Doli on The Duality and the Transformation of Kosovo-Serbia Dialogue into an Enlargement Mechanism
Ambassador Lecture Series with Dren Doli, Ambassador of Kosovo to the Kingdom of the Netherlands
-
Article by Alessandro Cuomo and Ellen Vos on the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change published in the Common Market Law Review 63(3)
Alessandro Cuomo and Ellen Vos, ‘The European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change: Fit For Purpose?’ (2026) 63 Common Market Law Review