Zoekresultaten

… board applies a career-development policy with clear criteria that personal professors and professors with a specialised remit must satisfy. Process » The faculty board adopts the chair plan. » Every year, the faculty board will determine whether there is cause to have new academic fields represented at the professorship level or whether existing academic fields should be discontinued (e.g. upon the departure of a professor with a personal chair). » Every year, the dean discusses the chair plan … can decide to appoint an external candidate as distinguished professor (2.A.2.) 3 17.10.1508 MUO-HRM Version 23 June 2017 CvB17.0527 2. Types of chair: full professors and endowed chairs Under the Dutch Higher Education and Scientific Research Act (hereinafter referred to as WHW), full professors are classified as university staff as are professors holding an endowed chair. Full professors have principal responsibility for the development of their assigned academic field and the subject matter … report The structure report must meet the same requirements as structure reports for full professors and be adopted by the Faculty Board and approved by the Board of Deans in the same way. 2.B.4 Assessment of request for a declaration of authority When deciding whether to grant a declaration of authority, the Executive Board must give an assessment of the legal entity submitting the request in accordance with the following criteria: a) Full legal capacity. b) Undisputed social and/or academic …

… 2024 EERs (preliminary discussion) April 2024 Nominal plans (Ba GW + BEPH, inclusive DTZ + Ba GW) (second discussion) April 2024 Joint EPC’s (Health, Medicine, BMS) meeting April 2024 Draft meeting schedule EPC Health (next AY) May 2024 Year reports / Improvement plans / Nominal Plan (Master’s) May/Juni 2024 EERs (discussion + advice) May 2024 Evaluation of the EPC Health + individual meetings (own functioning) June 2024 New EPC members/renewal of appointments (FR) May/June 2024 16 6.4 OC HS …

… component/course. The board of examiners can appoint other members of the scientific staff and experts from outside the programme as examiner. 4. The board of examiners can decide to withdraw an appointment as examiner if the examiner does not cohere to laws and regulations or rules of the board of examiners, or if the assessment skills of the examiner (construct, examine and judge) has repeatedly proven to be of insufficient quality. SECTION 2 REGISTRATIONS Article 2.1 Registration of courses … the thesis. If the board of examiners thinks the appeal is well-founded and agrees with the appeal, the final grade for the content of the thesis will be the average of the grades of the three examiners 6. A student can only request a 3rd examiner when the grades of the 1st and 2nd examiner are sufficient. Article 2.4 Rounding 1. In appropriate cases, grades are rounded as follows, unless stated otherwise: a grade of ‘.50’ or more is rounded up, and a grade of less than ‘.50’ will be rounded … of the course exam or in consultation with the course coordinator. 6. If the percentage of failed exam scripts exceeds 40% of the total number of students, the course coordinator consults the board of examiners in order to determine whether there are grounds for adjusting the absolute norm. Such grounds may include: the scores of previous years and the level of difficulty of the exam. 7. In the event that, in addition to the course exam at the end, the course is partly assessed by means of …

… members of the scientific staff and experts from outside the programme as examiner. 4. The board of examiners can decideto withdraw an appointment as examiner in consultation with the line manager or administrative manager if the examiner does not cohere to laws and regulations or rules of the board of examiners, or if the assessment skills of the examiner (construct, examine and judge) has repeatedly proven to be of insufficient quality. Article 1.4 Rules of Procedure for Exams The Rules of … the thesis. If the board of examiners thinks the appeal is well-founded and agrees with the appeal, the final grade for the content of the thesis will be the average of the grades of the three examiners 6. A student can only request a 3rd examiner when the grades of the 1st and 2nd examiner are sufficient. Article 2.4 Rounding 1. . Final grades are rounded off to one decimal place. 2. If the grade for an exam is calculated by combining grades for different components of the exam, these partial … of the course exam or in consultation with the course coordinator. 6. If the percentage of failed exam scripts exceeds 40% of the total number of students, the course coordinator consults the board of examiners in order to determine whether there are grounds for adjusting the absolute norm. Such grounds may include: the scores of previous years and the level of difficulty of the exam. 7. In the event that, in addition to the course exam at the end, the course is partly assessed by means of …

… award or on the day of written approval of the PhD thesis if the award precedes thesis approval. Financial Support • The KTF will cover 50% of the salary costs (Scale 10-4 in the first year and, if applicable, Scale 10-5 in the second year or part thereof). The remaining 50% must be matched by the candidate’s institute. • The research institutes guarantee that the laureate can carry out the research project. • The matching from the institute is fully contributed towards the implementation of the … participation, public outreach) and layman publications o Leadership: research vision, collaborations and networking, international and/or interdisciplinary research activities, membership of boards/committees, organization of conferences/workshops, involvement in the organization of meetings, other (non-research) activities in group/institute, growth/potential towards independence Pagina 4 van 5 Evaluation Procedure The Executive Board Maastricht UMC+ decides which applicants will be … • The content and delivery of their presentation (20%) Conflict of Interest Members of the WMUMC+ with a conflict of interest regarding a specific KTF proposal will be excluded from the evaluation and interview process. A conflict of interest arises when a member involved in the evaluation has a personal, professional (e.g., supervisor), or organizational relationship with the applicant(s), affecting their ability to perform their role objectively and without bias. Pagina 5 van 5 Obligations for …

… members of the scientific staff and experts from outside the programme as examiner. 4. The board of examiners can decideto withdraw an appointment as examiner in consultation with the line manager or administrative manager if the examiner does not cohere to laws and regulations or rules of the board of examiners, or if the assessment skills of the examiner (construct, examine and judge) has repeatedly proven to be of insufficient quality. Article 1.4 Rules of Procedure for Exams The Rules of … the thesis. If the board of examiners thinks the appeal is well-founded and agrees with the appeal, the final grade for the content of the thesis will be the average of the grades of the three examiners 6. A student can only request a 3rd examiner when the grades of the 1st and 2nd examiner are sufficient. Article 2.4 Rounding 1. . Final grades are rounded off to one decimal place. 2. If the grade for an exam is calculated by combining grades for different components of the exam, these partial … of the course exam or in consultation with the course coordinator. 6. If the percentage of failed exam scripts exceeds 40% of the total number of students, the course coordinator consults the board of examiners in order to determine whether there are grounds for adjusting the absolute norm. Such grounds may include: the scores of previous years and the level of difficulty of the exam. 7. In the event that, in addition to the course exam at the end, the course is partly assessed by means of …