roadmap_staff_0.pdf
(151.8 kB, PDF)
… plagiarism, not respecting intellectual property, or copyright infringement or other misconduct on the part of staff or others involved in research. Impartiality You suspect a conflict of interest of you yourself and/or colleague, e.g., because of a company, a relation, business gifts or invitations, financial interests or ancillary activities. Social safety You are not treated with respect by one or more others (in word, gesture, or writing). You suffer from discrimination, aggression, violence, … students should deal responsibly with ethical or social issues threatening scientific integrity. But what if you make a mistake, or suspect others to violate scientific integrity consciously or unconsciously? Speak up about it! This roadmap shows you where to go to start an open conversation for different types of (suspected) integrity breaches or social safety. All researchers will face integrity dilemmas. Mistakes are expected, respected, inspected, and corrected. Make it open to discussion; speak up about it! Discuss with the person concerned and/or with someone within your research environment, if you feel comfortable CCP (Concerns & Complaints Point) who will guide you to the following contact persons Speak up about it! Platform Scientific Integrity Data breach / ICT You suspect that you or another employee may be careless with information, e.g., violating confidentiality, not guaranteeing privacy. This can be done, for example, by …