Zoekresultaten
- EER 23-24 MSc Biobased Materials-Systems Biology-Imaging Engineering.pdf (589.89 kB, PDF)… to one of the programmes; board of Examiners the board referred to in Article 7.12 of the Act; CANVAS web-based learning management system, or LMS. It is used by Maastricht University, coordinators, tutors, examiners, and students to access and manage online course learning materials and assessment. course coordinator the person responsible for overseeing the coordination of a course; course manual a paper or electronic document outlining the content and intended learning outcomes of a course, … communication (policy, content, examination) will proceed via available communication tools: Student Portal, Intranet and regular UM e-mail or CANVAS. 2. Students carry the responsibility to stay updated on course-related communication by regularly checking their university e-mail, CANVAS, Intranet and Student Portal. Any information disseminated via these communication lines will be assumed to be known. Education and Examination Regulations Page 16 of 38 Article 3.5 Study load Each course year … enabling other students to engage in fraud is also considered fraud under these regulations. Education and Examination Regulations Page 23 of 38 3. ‘Plagiarism’ refers to the use and presentation of ideas or words from one’s own (autoplagiarism) or someone else’s sources without proper acknowledgement of the sources. 4. If the Board of Examiners determines that a student has engaged in fraudulent behaviour with respect to an exam or exam component, the Board of Examiners will take appropriate …
- fse_eer_2022-2023_master_programmes.pdf (440.49 kB, PDF)… to one of the programmes; Board of Examiners the board referred to in Article 7.12 of the Act; CANVAS web-based learning management system, or LMS. It is used by Maastricht University, coordinators, tutors, examiners, and students to access and manage online course learning materials and assessment. course coordinator the person responsible for overseeing the coordination of a course; course manual a paper or electronic document outlining the content and intended learning outcomes of a course, … communication (policy, content, examination) will proceed via available communication tools: Student Portal, Intranet and regular UM e-mail or CANVAS . 2. Students carry the responsibility to stay updated on course-related communication by regularly checking their university e-mail, CANVAS, Intranet and Student Portal. Any information disseminated via these communication lines will be assumed to be known. Education and Examination Regulations Page 16 of 38 Article 3.5 Study load Each course … Page 23 of 38 skills. Allowing and/or enabling other students to engage in fraud is also considered fraud under these regulations. 3. ‘Plagiarism’ refers to the use and presentation of ideas or words from one’s own (autoplagiarism) or someone else’s sources without proper acknowledgment of the sources. 4. If the Board of Examiners determines that a student has engaged in fraudulent behaviour with respect to an exam or exam component, the Board of Examiners will take appropriate …
- Eindrapport Onder welke condities doet Gezonde School ertoe.pdf (3.19 MB, PDF)… met behulp van 8 indicatoren in kaart gebracht. Het gaat daarbij om indicatoren als verankering in de GGD-regio, intensiteit van de begeleiding en percentage scholen met vignetten. Deze indicatoren zijn vastgesteld vanuit de CoP en semigestructureerde online groepsinterviews: één van twee uur in 2021 en één van anderhalf uur in 2022. Deelnemers waren één tot vier medewerkers per GGD (N = 21 deelnemers totaal in ronde 1; 18 in ronde 2), die samen een goed beeld hadden van zowel de uitvoering als visie rondom Gezonde School ondersteuning vanuit de regio. Na beide interviews is een member check gedaan van de gestructureerde gesprekssamenvatting. Aanvullend zijn visiedocumenten, jaarverslagen, websites geraadpleegd. De data zijn geanalyseerd door thematische analyse in Nvivo. Verschillen in ondersteuningsniveaus zijn Vraag 1: Regionale … op scholen is in kaart gebracht door middel van een in het project ontwikkelde implementatievragenlijst bestaande uit 28 items. Hiervoor zijn vijf fasen doorlopen: 1) semigestructureerde interviews (N = 13), 2) revisie in de CoP (N = 14), 3) twee online expert consultatie rondes (N = 38), 4) pre-tests onder schoolpersoneel (N = 14) en 5) psychometrische testen (N = 535). Dit gebeurde aan de hand van zeven dimensies: 1) naleving van het gedachtegoed (per Gezonde School-thema), 2) intensiteit, 3) …
- 2023-2024-FPN_RR_Research_MasterCCN.pdf (699.95 kB, PDF)… the requirements specified under 4a or 4b. a. A research internship at the UM (internal internship) needs two supervisors with a PhD. However, there is an exception for PhD-students and for UM lecturers without a PhD. When they completed the UTQ workshop ‘assessment’, they can be second supervisor. When in addition, the PhD student or the UM lecturer without PhD already supervised two research internships as a second supervisor, they can also act as first supervisor. b. In case of a research … or Board of Examiners member; c. has copied or attempted to copy from another student, or has provided the opportunity to copy; d. has collaborated on a graded assignment, paper or practical, whereas this was not explicitly allowed; e. has posed as someone else or let someone else pose as the student; f. has misled, or at least attempted to mislead or provided the opportunity to mislead an invigilator, an examiner, a corrector or the Board of Examiners with respect to the exam; g. has used an obfuscation method in submitted work that is likely to have the effect that plagiarism checking tools do not work optimally; h. has used artificial intelligence software (e.g. GPT_X, Chat GPT (Plus), BARD etc. …) when not explicitly allowed to do so in the exam instructions and/or Rules of Procedure for Examinations; i. has disregarded …
- 2023-2024-FPN_RR_Master_in_Psychology.pdf (668.03 kB, PDF)… the requirements specified under 4a or 4b. a. A research internship at the UM (internal internship) needs two supervisors with a PhD. However, there is an exception for PhD-students and for UM lecturers without a PhD. When they completed the UTQ workshop ‘assessment’, they can be second supervisor. When in addition, the PhD student or the UM lecturer without PhD already supervised two research internships as a second supervisor, they can also act as first supervisor. b. In case of a research … or Board of Examiners member; c. has copied or attempted to copy from another student, or has provided the opportunity to copy; d. has collaborated on a graded assignment, paper or practical, whereas this was not explicitly allowed; e. has posed as someone else or let someone else pose as the student; f. has misled, or at least attempted to mislead or provided the opportunity to mislead an invigilator, an examiner, a corrector or the Board of Examiners with respect to the exam; g. has used an obfuscation method in submitted work that is likely to have the effect that plagiarism checking tools do not work optimally; h. has used artificial intelligence software (e.g. GPT-X, Chat GPT (Plus), BARD etc. …), when not explicitly allowed to do so in the exam instructions and/or Rules of Procedure for Examinations; i. has disregarded …
- 2023-2024-FPN_RR_Master_in_Forensic_Psychology.pdf (482.1 kB, PDF)… the requirements specified under 4a or 4b. a. A research internship at the UM (internal internship) needs two supervisors with a PhD. However, there is an exception for PhD-students and for UM lecturers without a PhD. When they completed the UTQ workshop ‘assessment’, they can be second supervisor. When in addition, the PhD student or the UM lecturer without PhD already supervised two research internships as a second supervisor, they can also act as first supervisor. b. In case of a research … from another student, or has provided the opportunity to copy; d. has collaborated on a graded assignment, paper or practical, whereas this was not explicitly allowed; Rules and Regulations Master in Forensic Psychology 2023-2024 8 e. has posed as someone else or let someone else pose as the student; f. has misled, or at least attempted to mislead or provided the opportunity to mislead an invigilator, an examiner, a corrector or the Board of Examiners with respect to the exam; g. has used an obfuscation method in submitted work that is likely to have the effect that plagiarism checking tools do not work optimally; h. has used artificial intelligence software (e.g. GPT_X, Chat GPT (Plus), BARD etc. …) when not explicitly allowed to do so in the exam instructions and/or Rules of Procedure of Examinations; i. has disregarded …
- fhml_rr_bsc_bbs_2021-22_18-10-2021_2.pdf (702.35 kB, PDF)… competence development is determined at the end of every course year, as laid down in the course assessment plans, and C and P competence assessment plans. 2. In their annual transition meeting at the end of the academic year, the Board of Examiners checks the results of all students and may decide on exemption to the requirements and if so grant admission to the higher course year. The program management and the student advisors are consulted before or during the meeting on issues of students’ … (e.g. scrum method). Article 2.6 Written assignments 1. The requirements with regard to papers that are part of a course or the portfolio will be announced in the respective assessment plan in the Student Portal. 2. All written assignments must be checked for plagiarism using Ouriginal or another plagiarism-screening program approved by the Board of Examiners. 3. The bachelor's thesis must be written on an individual basis. Article 2.7 Internship The Programme management determines the rules and … or Board of Examiners member; c) has copied or attempted to copy from another student, or has provided the opportunity to copy; d) has collaborated on a graded assignment, paper or practical, whereas this was not explicitly allowed; e) has posed as someone else or let someone else pose as him/her; f) has misled, or at least attempted to mislead or provided the opportunity to mislead an invigilator, an examiner, a corrector, or the Board of Examiners with respect to the exam; g) has used an …
- 2021-2022_fpn_rulesregulations_research_master_v001_19-08-2021.pdf (191.51 kB, PDF)… have to be assigned, who meet criteria. a. A research internship at the UM (internal internship) needs two supervisors with a PhD. However, there is an exception for PhD-students and for UM lecturers without a PhD. When they completed the UTQ workshop ‘assessment’, they can be second supervisor. When in addition, the PhD student or the UM lecturer without PhD already supervised two research internships as a second supervisor, they can also act as first supervisor. b. In case of a research … the opportunity to copy; Rules and Regulations for the Research Master in Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience 2021-2022 8 d. has collaborated on a graded assignment, paper or practical, whereas this was not explicitly allowed; e. has posed as someone else or let someone else pose as the student; f. has misled, or at least attempted to mislead or provided the opportunity to mislead an invigilator, an examiner, a corrector or the Board of Examiners with respect to the exam. g. has used an obfuscation method in submitted work that is likely to have the effect that plagiarism checking tools do not work optimally; h. has disregarded the instructions of the invigilator or the instructions for the exam (component) such that an unfair advantage might have been obtained; i. has performed actions or omissions which make it …
- rr_bsc_bbs_2021-22_18-10-2021.pdf (702.32 kB, PDF)… competence development is determined at the end of every course year, as laid down in the course assessment plans, and C and P competence assessment plans. 2. In their annual transition meeting at the end of the academic year, the Board of Examiners checks the results of all students and may decide on exemption to the requirements and if so grant admission to the higher course year. The program management and the student advisors are consulted before or during the meeting on issues of students’ … (e.g. scrum method). Article 2.6 Written assignments 1. The requirements with regard to papers that are part of a course or the portfolio will be announced in the respective assessment plan in the Student Portal. 2. All written assignments must be checked for plagiarism using Ouriginal or another plagiarism-screening program approved by the Board of Examiners. 3. The bachelor's thesis must be written on an individual basis. Article 2.7 Internship The Programme management determines the rules and … or Board of Examiners member; c) has copied or attempted to copy from another student, or has provided the opportunity to copy; d) has collaborated on a graded assignment, paper or practical, whereas this was not explicitly allowed; e) has posed as someone else or let someone else pose as him/her; f) has misled, or at least attempted to mislead or provided the opportunity to mislead an invigilator, an examiner, a corrector, or the Board of Examiners with respect to the exam; g) has used an …
- fpn_rr_rmaccn2022-2023.pdf (703.85 kB, PDF)… the requirements specified under 4a or 4b. a. A research internship at the UM (internal internship) needs two supervisors with a PhD. However, there is an exception for PhD-students and for UM lecturers without a PhD. When they completed the UTQ workshop ‘assessment’, they can be second supervisor. When in addition, the PhD student or the UM lecturer without PhD already supervised two research internships as a second supervisor, they can also act as first supervisor. b. In case of a research … or Board of Examiners member; c. has copied or attempted to copy from another student, or has provided the opportunity to copy; d. has collaborated on a graded assignment, paper or practical, whereas this was not explicitly allowed; e. has posed as someone else or let someone else pose as the student; f. has misled, or at least attempted to mislead or provided the opportunity to mislead an invigilator, an examiner, a corrector or the Board of Examiners with respect to the exam; g. has used an obfuscation method in submitted work that is likely to have the effect that plagiarism checking tools do not work optimally; h. has disregarded the instructions of the invigilator or the instructions for the exam (component) such that an unfair advantage might have been obtained; i. has performed actions or omissions which make it …