van Zelst, B., & Masumy, N. (2024). The Concept of Arbitrability under the New York Convention: The Quest for Comprehensive Reform. Journal of International Arbitration, 41(3), 345-370. Article JOIA2024016. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2024016
Ortolani, P., & Van Zelst, B. (2023). International commercial courts and EU law: easing the tension. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 14(1), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idac030
van Zelst, B. (2023). Dealing with Accusations of Illegality in International Arbitration: Dutch Perspectives on the Interaction Between Private Law and Criminal Law Standards. Journal of International Arbitration, 40(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2023002
Hendrikse, R., Werners, F.-J., van der Linden, J., Schoenmakers, A., & van Zelst, B. (2022). Kroniek Burgerlijk Procesrecht 2021. Advocatenblad, 59-74. https://doi.org/10.5553/AB/0165-13312022102002025
Van Zelst, B., & Van Besouw, D. L. (2021). Private International Law Aspects of Arbitrator Liability: A European Perspective Post-Brexit. Journal of International Arbitration, 38(6), 723-760. https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2021034
van Zelst, B. (2021). Beg S.p.a. t. Italië (EHRM, 5312/11) – Arbitrage in de schaduw van beginselen van fundamenteel procesrecht. EHRC 2021/0133. Case note on: Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens, 20/05/21, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD000531211 (EHRC 2021/0133). European Human Rights Cases Updates.
van Zelst, B. (2021). De kracht (en het gevaar) van cognitive illusions in het civielrechtelijk debat: Over de rol van de advocaat in het voorkomen van onjuiste beslissingen. Nederlands Juristenblad, (17), Article NJB 2021/1225.
van Zelst, B. (2021). Similar ≠ Equal – a Nuanced Approach to Remote Hearings: A Dutch Perspective. Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, 87(1), 94-110. https://doi.org/10.54648/amdm2021006