Search results

… © 2023 Maastricht University Nothing in this publication may be reproduced and/or made public by means of printing, offset, photocopy or microfilm or in any digital, electronic, optical or any other form without the prior written permission of the owner of the copyright. Faculty of Science and Engineering Department of Advanced Computing Sciences MSc Artificial Intelligence MSc Data Science for Decision Making Rules and Regulations MSc AI, MSc DSDM … of components can be non-linear. Rules and Regulations MSc AI, MSc DSDM Page 7 of 25 ARTICLE 2.2 GRADE DESCRIPTORS The exam/assessment results of study components (including courses and projects) and the thesis are assigned on a 10-point scale, where a result of at least a 6.0/10 represents a pass. Whole grades are awarded to exams. Both half and whole grades can be awarded for study components of at least 10 ECTS as well as for projects. 10-points Descriptor UK US 10 Outstanding A* A+ 9.5 A* … in the exam. The Board of Examiners will be informed after the exam of any irregularities and violations that took place before, during or after the exam. The Board of Examiners may decide to take further sanctions and/or measures. 17. In the case of online/proctored exams, it is the responsibility of the student to make the exam in the way it is instructed. Failure to do so is an irregularity and means the exam will be invalid. If it is not possible to adequately supervise the student during (part …

… the thorough preparation and extensive documentation furnished by the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, by the hospitable reception given to the committee during the on-site visit, and by the frank and friendly spirit in which staff members engaged with our queries during the interviews. I would also like to express my special appreciation for the invaluable support provided by the committee's secretary, Sylvia Bastiaanssen. Prof. dr J.Th. Leerssen chair Evaluation Report Arts and Social Sciences … in any way imply that the final score was an average of all scores. The final score was only given after careful consideration by the entire committee. The Committee’s assessment at the institute level primarily focused on strategy and organization, whereas the programme assessment primarily focused on performance and activities of researchers and the results of their work (output and outcome). At the institute level, the Committee paid explicit attention to the (policy regarding) education and … Mission and goals; Strategy and policy (Inter)national position and recognition; Prominence of the pro-gramme director and other research staff; Impact and significance of research results in the field Human resources; Funding policies and earning capacity; Rele-vance of research facilities Objectives and institutional embedding; Structure of programmes; Supervision; Success rates; Educational resources Productivity B1. Productivity strategy B2. Productivity Productivity goals; Publication Strategy; …

… the thorough preparation and extensive documentation furnished by the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, by the hospitable reception given to the committee during the on-site visit, and by the frank and friendly spirit in which staff members engaged with our queries during the interviews. I would also like to express my special appreciation for the invaluable support provided by the committee's secretary, Sylvia Bastiaanssen. Prof. dr J.Th. Leerssen chair Evaluation Report Arts and Social Sciences … in any way imply that the final score was an average of all scores. The final score was only given after careful consideration by the entire committee. The Committee’s assessment at the institute level primarily focused on strategy and organization, whereas the programme assessment primarily focused on performance and activities of researchers and the results of their work (output and outcome). At the institute level, the Committee paid explicit attention to the (policy regarding) education and … Mission and goals; Strategy and policy (Inter)national position and recognition; Prominence of the pro-gramme director and other research staff; Impact and significance of research results in the field Human resources; Funding policies and earning capacity; Rele-vance of research facilities Objectives and institutional embedding; Structure of programmes; Supervision; Success rates; Educational resources Productivity B1. Productivity strategy B2. Productivity Productivity goals; Publication Strategy; …