Local economic systems do not innovate all in the same way. They do not react and contribute in the same way to global challenges, technological change and globalisation. Within cities, industries, clusters and regions, technical change and innovation is governed through the interactions of various agents with different capabilities (e.g. individuals, firms, universities, policy makers, institutions). To understand innovation and innovation policy, we must understand how these various agents (as producers and users of knowledge) interact and develop their capabilities. Modern ideas about knowledge imply that knowledge transfer is not as easy as was once thought. The diffusion of a new idea or capability to the many agents who might find it useful is a complex process, often involving informal institutions, face-to-face communication and demonstration. Not all knowledge can be codified, and the non-codified knowledge, which is by nature difficult to transmit, is extremely important for both innovation and diffusion. This implies that much knowledge creation and diffusion is geographically localized and policy must take this into account. In the first week of this course, we review local system approaches and examine how modern ideas about knowledge and innovation affect our understanding of the processes of innovation and of innovation policy. The focus is on the systemic features of innovation and how they play out in a local context. In the second week, we concentrate on taxonomies of innovation and knowledge flows. In some regions knowledge transmission across buyer-supplier links in value-chains are central, in other, science-based systems, innovation builds on scientific advances in university research. In some regions knowledge creation is key, in others knowledge absorption or adoption is central to the region’s progress. Some regions are dominated by high tech, others by low tech, but innovation occurs in both. These axes all enter any taxonomy of regional innovation. One specific question we address is the role of universities in local development. Universities can be a source of novel knowledge and innovation, or a source of highly skilled labour. The role a university plays depends on what kind of local innovation is driving the region. In the third week, we concentrate on policies that attempt to build strong links among local agents in innovation chains or value chains (e.g. cluster policies, smart specialisation). For example, concerns about creating a critical mass of knowledge workers have led many regions to create "science parks", or "technopoles", hoping to generate new industries, or to become the next Silicon Valley. But less dramatic policies also exist. In the fourth week, we analyse the contents of successful policy. The main policy issue is how to create interactions among local knowledge actors that contribute to the performance of local economies. What can we learn from success stories from different local systems? E.g. Italian industrial districts have often been considered paradoxical: small, relatively isolated regions in Italy, apparently poorly connected to the outside world, are world leaders in their fields. How does this happen, and could it be reproduced? Will smart cities be the new locus and focus of specialisation and growth? Has globalization removed local effects or can local policy makers still influence their economies? This course overall looks at how local agents interact in the innovation ecosystem. The goal is to analyse and understand how these local interactions and interventions contribute to the performance of the local economies, and to prepare policy recommendations for specific regional development strategies.
Doelstellingen van dit vak
After this course, students should be able to: ● Describe in detail the concepts of Codified/Tacit knowledge, Knowledge Spillovers, Triple Helix (University-Industry-Government relations); Regional Innovation Systems; Smart Specialisation Strategies, Quality of Local Governance, Smart Cities, Smart Growth ● Apply theories and concepts from Innovation and Innovation Systems literature to local contexts. ● Analyse how local agents interact and how they contribute to innovation activities (using scientometrics/bibliometrics, network analysis, taxonomies), and thus to the performance of local economy using various measures and indicators. ● Demonstrate analytical conceptualisation and applied skills based on systems thinking (system's constituents, interactions, temporality, embeddedness, performance) for local development. ● Prepare policy recommendations for specific regional development strategies.
There are no specific prerequisites for this course.
Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research policy, 13(6), 343-373. Cowan, R., & Foray, D. (1997). The economics of codification and the diffusion of knowledge. Industrial and corporate change, 6(3), 595-622. Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of urban economics, 42(3), 422-448. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. (1998). Geographically localized knowledge: spillovers or markets?. Economic Inquiry, 36(1), 65-86. Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2000). Governance and upgrading: linking industrial cluster and global value chain research (Vol. 120). Brighton: Institute of Development Studies. Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001). Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey. Industrial and corporate change, 10(4), 975-1005. Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. In The Oxford handbook of innovation. Cowan, R. (2005). Network models of innovation and knowledge diffusion. Clusters, networks and innovation, 29-53. Shapiro, J. M. (2006). Smart cities: quality of life, productivity, and the growth effects of human capital. The review of economics and statistics, 88(2), 324-335. Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialisation–the concept. Knowledge economists policy brief, 9(85), 100. Rabellotti, R., Carabelli, A., & Hirsch, G. (2009). Italian industrial districts on the move: where are they going?. European Planning Studies, 17(1), 19-41. European Commission (2010) Regional Policy contributing to smart growth in Europe 2020 SEC(2010) 1183 Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional studies, 45(7), 893-904. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of urban technology, 18(2), 65-82. Srholec, M., & Verspagen, B. (2012). The Voyage of the Beagle into innovation: explorations on heterogeneity, selection, and sectors. Industrial and corporate change, 21(5), 1221-1253. Cowan, R., & Zinovyeva, N. (2013). University effects on regional innovation. Research Policy, 42(3), 788-800. Türkeli, S., & Wintjes, R. J. M. (2014). Towards the societal system of innovation: The case of metropolitan areas in Europe. UNU-MERIT WP Series 2014-040. Barrie, J., Zawdie, G., & João, E. (2019). Assessing the role of triple helix system intermediaries in nurturing an industrial biotechnology innovation network. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 209-223.