Research profile
Hylke Dijkstra is interested in the role of international organizations. He focuses, in particular, on policy-making dynamics within international organizations, including the informal processes taking place behind the scenes. He has published extensively on policy-making in the EU, NATO and UN, including in Cooperation and Conflict, Global Governance, International Peacekeeping, Journal of European Integration, Journal of European Public Policy and The Review of International Organizations. He is the author of International Organization (Palgrave, 2019; with Rittberger/Zangl/Kruck), International Organizations and Military Affairs (Routledge, 2016) and Policy-Making in EU Security and Defense (Palgrave, 2013).
Hylke Dijkstra is the principal investigator of an ERC Starting Grant (2019-2023). He also played a central role in the large-scale EU-CIVCAP research project (2015-2018), which is funded through Horizon 2020. This project is about analysing the civilian capabilities of the EU, UN and OSCE for conflict prevention and peacebuilding. As the Editor-in-Chief of Contemporary Security Policy, he furthermore leads one of the oldest academic journal in the area of security studies. The journal not only publishes cutting-edge research, but also seeks to engage with an audience of policy-makers.
Onderzoeksprojecten
Understanding and Strengthening EU Foreign and Security Policy in a Complex and Contested World (JOINT) (H2020) (2021-2023)
Challenges to EU foreign and security policy have been mounting in recent years. Systemic shifts such as the dwindling global engagement of the United States and the growing assertiveness of Russia and China hamper the ability of the EU and its member states to shape multilateral rules and compel them to rethink their role along new patterns of multipolar interactions. The collapse or severe weakening of state authority and governance in the EU’s neighbourhood and beyond create interconnected challenges extending into policy areas outside the traditional remit of foreign and security policy. Meanwhile, the emergence of nationalist forces often espousing Eurosceptic views complicates efforts to reach intra-EU consensus on international security matters.
Against this backdrop, JOINT, an interdisciplinary research project, combining research with public opinion analysis, innovative policymaker engagement and proactive public outreach, addresses the question: How to make EU foreign and security policy governance structures more joined-up and sustainable in a rapidly changing and contested international environment?
Who gets to live forever? Toward an Institutional Theory on the Decline and Death of International Organisations (ERC) (2019-2023)
Many international organisations (IOs) are under significant pressure. The World Health Organization was heavily criticized over its handling of the Ebola outbreak. The United States has not contributed to the UNESCO budget since 2011 and plans to quit in 2018. The United Kingdom is negotiating its exit from the EU and Burundi left the International Criminal Court. The ultimate way for states to show their discontent is to disband IOs: no less than a third of the IOs, created between 1905 and 2005, has formally ceased to exist. While academics have analysed how IOs are designed and develop, we know virtually nothing about decline and death. This project addresses therefore the question why do IOs decline or die?
Website: http://www.nestior.eu
Preventing and Responding to Conflict: Developing EU Civilian Capabilities for a Sustainable Peace (EU-CIVCAP) (H2020) (2015-2018)
The European Union (EU) regularly sends policemen, rule of law experts, and monitors on civilian missions to other countries in order to prevent and respond to conflict. Among the 20+ civilian missions are recent deployments to Congo, Kosovo, Georgia and Ukraine. This research project analyses the capabilities which these policemen, rule of law experts and monitors need to properly carry out their functions. These capabilities range from armoured vehicles, to training and communcation systems. In addition to carrying out research, the project also has a strong dissemination component to help EU officials in improving civilian capabilities.
This large-scale project, funded under Horizon 2020 Secure Societies, is coordinated by the University of Bristol and contains ten universities, think tanks and EU agencies from across Europe. Researchers at Maastricht University focus on the EU civilian capabilities needed to respond to crises in comparison to other international organisations such as the UN and OSCE. They also analyse interactions between the EU, UN and OSCE in terms of civilian capabilities.
Dijkstra, H., P. Petrov and E. Mahr (2019) "Learning to deploy civilian capabilities: How the United Nations, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and European Union have changed their crisis management institutions", Cooperation and Conflict, 54(4), 524-543.
Petrov, P., H. Dijkstra, K. Đokić, P. H. Zartsdahl & E. Mahr (2019) "All hands on deck: levels of dependence between the EU and other international organizations in peacebuilding", Journal of European Integration, 41(8), 1027-1043.
Dijkstra, H., E. Mahr, P. Petrov, K. Dokic and P.H. Zartsdahl (2018), "The EU’s partners in crisis response and peacebuilding: complementarities and synergies with the UN and OSCE", Global Affairs, 4(2-3), 185-196.
Beyond Sovereignty: Delegation and Agency in International Security (Marie Curie) (FP7) (2012-2014)
The United Nations (UN), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and European Union (EU) currently have a record number of 250,000 troops deployed – up from 11,000 in 1989 and 90,000 in 2002. From Afghanistan to Congo, Haiti and Kosovo, these soldiers monitor inter-state agreements, provide stability and even fight insurgency. They oftentimes perform their duties in difficult environments. In their day-to-day operations, they are supported by a plethora of international secretariats in Brussels and New York employing thousands of civil servants. These secretariats play a vital role in the success or failure of military operations.
This project investigated why sovereign states delegate such important functions to international secretariats in international security. It also analysed under which conditions international secretariats exert influence in policy-making. The project was based at the University of Oxford and funded by the FP7 Marie Curie IEF Programme of the European Union.
Dijkstra, H. (2016) International Organizations and Military Affairs, London: Routledge.
Publicaties
Core publications:
-
Rittberger, V., Zangl, B., Kruck, A., & Dijkstra, H. (2019). International Organization. (3rd ed.) Red Globe Press.
-
Dijkstra, H. (2016). International Organizations and Military Affairs. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. Global Institutions https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315638102
-
Dijkstra, H. (2013). Policy-Making in EU Security and Defense: An Institutional Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan. European Administrative Governance
-
Dijkstra, H., Petrov, P., & Mahr, E. (2019). Learning to deploy civilian capabilities: How the United Nations, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and European Union have changed their crisis management institutions. Cooperation and Conflict, 54(4), 524–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836718823814
-
Dijkstra, H. (2017). Collusion in International Organizations: How States Benefit from the Authority of Secretariats. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 23(4), 601-618. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02304006
-
Dijkstra, H. (2015). Shadow Bureaucracies and the Unilateral Control of International Secretariats: Insights from UN Peacekeeping. Review of International Organizations, 10(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-014-9203-7
-
Dijkstra, H. (2015). Functionalism, Multiple Principals and the Reform of the NATO Secretariat after the Cold War. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(1), 128-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836714532919
-
Dijkstra, H. (2012). Agenda-setting in the Common Security and Defence Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective. Cooperation and Conflict, 47(4), 454-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836712462772
-
Dijkstra, H. (2012). Efficiency versus Sovereignty: Delegation to the UN Secretariat in Peacekeeping. International Peacekeeping, 19(5), 581-596. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2012.721993
-
Dijkstra, H. (2010). Explaining variation in the role of the EU Council Secretariat in first and second pillar policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(4), 527-544. [922332328]. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501761003673526
Meest recente publicaties:
-
Debre, M., & Dijkstra, H. (2022). Are international organisations in decline? An absolute and relative perspective on institutional change. Global Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13170
-
Dijkstra, H., von Allwörden, L., Schütte, L., & Zaccaria, G. (2022). Donald Trump and the survival strategies of international organisations: when can institutional actors counter existential challenges? Cambridge Review of International Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2022.2136566
-
Bargues, P., Dandashly, A., Dijkstra, H., & Noutcheva, G. (2022). Time to Re-engage with Kosovo and Serbia: Strengthening EU Foreign and Security Policy amidst Internal Contestation. Instituto Affari Internazionali.
-
Bargués, P., Dandashly, A., Dijkstra, H., & Noutcheva, G. (2022). Beyond License Plates and Crisis Management: Options for the EU for a Final Agreement on Kosovo and Serbia.
-
Dijkstra, H., & Debre, M. (2022). The Death of Major International Organizations: When Institutional Stickiness is not Enough. Global Studies Quarterly, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksac048
-
Alcaro, R., Bargués, P., Dijkstra, H., & Paikin, Z. (2022). A Joined-Up Union, a Stronger Europe. A Conceptual Framework to Investigate EU Foreign and Security Policy in a Complex and Contested World. Instituto Affari Internazionali.
-
Dijkstra, H., Dunn Cavelty, M., Jenne, N., & Reykers, Y. (2022). War in Ukraine. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(3), 464-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2099085
-
Dijkstra, H. (2022). The War in Ukraine and Studying the EU as a Security Actor. Instituto Affari Internazionali.
-
Dandashly, A., Dijkstra, H., Marafona, M., Noutcheva, G., & Paikin, Z. (2021). Multipolarity and EU Foreign and Security Policy: Divergent Approaches to Conflict and Crisis Response. Instituto Affari Internazionali.
-
Debre, M., & Dijkstra, H. (2021). COVID-19 and Policy Responses by International Organizations: Crisis of Liberal International Order or Window of Opportunity? Global Policy, 12(4), 443-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12975
