Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., Vrij, A., & Merckelbach, H. (2016). Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) Cannot Distinguish Between Truthful and Fabricated Accounts of a Negative Event. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, [243]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00243

Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., Vrij, A., & Merckelbach, H. (2016). Strong, but Wrong: Lay People's and Police Officers' Beliefs about Verbal and Nonverbal Cues to Deception. PLOS ONE, 11(6), [e0156615]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156615

Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., & Vrij, A. (2014). Using an Example Statement Increases Information but Does Not Increase Accuracy of CBCA, RM, and SCAN. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 11(2), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1409

Bogaard, G., Meijer, E., Vrij, A., Broers, N., & Merckelbach, H. (2014). SCAN is largely driven by 12 criteria: results from sexual abuse statements. Psychology Crime & Law, 20(5), 430-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.793338

Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., Vrij, A., & Merckelbach, H. L. G. J. (2011). Leugenaars praten anders. De Psycholoog, 46, 10-19.

Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., Vrij, A., & Nahari, G. (2022). Detecting deception using comparable truth baselines. Psychology Crime & Law. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2030334

Verschuere, B., Bogaard, G., & Meijer, E. (2021). Discriminating deceptive from truthful statements using the verifiability approach: A meta-analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 374-384. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3775

Bogaard, G., & Meijer, E. H. (2020). Stereotypical behavioural cues — but not their order — influence credibility judgements. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 17(2), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1543

Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., & Van der Plas, I. (2020). A model statement does not enhance the verifiability approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(1), 96-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3596

Bogaard, G., van der Mark, J., & Meijer, E. H. (2019). Detecting false intentions using unanticipated questions. PLOS ONE, 14(12), [e0226257]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226257

Verigin, B. L., Meijer, E. H., Bogaard, G., & Vrij, A. (2019). Lie prevalence, lie characteristics and strategies of self-reported good liars. PLOS ONE, 14(12), [e0225566]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225566

Otgaar, H., Bücken, C., Bogaard, G., Wade, K. A., Hopwood, A. R., Scoboria, A., & Howe, M. L. (2019). Nonbelieved Memories in The False Memory Archive. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(4), 429-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.07.003

Bogaard, G., Colwell, K., & Crans, S. (2019). Using the Reality Interview improves the accuracy of the Criteria Based Content Analysis and Reality Monitoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(6), 1018-1031. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3537

Boskovic, I., Dibbets, P., Bogaard, G., Hope, L., Jelicic, M., & Orthey, R. (2019). Verify the scene, report the symptoms: Testing the Verifiability Approach and SRSI in the detection of fabricated PTSD claims. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 24(2), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12149

De Rosa, J., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Blythe, A., Bogaard, G., Hally, A., & Colwell, K. (2019). A comparison of different investigative interviewing techniques in generating differential recall enhancement and detecting deception. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 16(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1519